new TNT pipe

Status
Not open for further replies.
I ran a PFP pipe on my SS lamey and thought the b-pipe hit better on the low end. I ended up selling that pipe with my 927cc 66e.

The more I think about the TNT chamber the more I like the idea. Heck, if people are buying carbon copies of superjet mod chamber, why not a stainless pipe that offers better performance


the B pipe DOES make better low end........thats common knowledge..it has been stated by chuckie on more than one occasoion, and by baxter himself...



in fact, on the 1000cc engines the B makes even more bottom end than the PFP, but the PFP makes it smoother and more controllable



Says who....this is not what I have been told. Purely bling factor.

stainless WILL make more power......B1 chambers are all stainless (at least the ltd's are)
 

GIL

Power In The Hands Of Few
Location
Cullman AL
So carbon WILL make less power?

Makes sense and that is what I have always read in to them.

Ask the people that have ridden my ski with Crammit's carbon limited chamber in it-it does NOT lose power after initial heat soak like so many think it does! I have spent soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
many hours testing chambers back to back and 'blind testing' chambers
swapping from alum to carbon and can tell no notable difference other than sound w/exhaust is dry and on the trailer. I have had several people ride my ski that should know what signs to look for and they say they feel no change in power!

Long story short-I am NOT sold on the whole carbon makes less power than aluminum theory. From what I have read-the ones that state the carbon loses power have not even tried them. My 2 cents.
 

tntsuperjet

Tntperformance-engineering.com
Location
Georgetown ca
Sorry i missed your question on materials.
To answer some of these myths.
Carbon vs stainless vs alum.
The biggest issue with pipes is temp control!
Carbon will not get hot, won't rev!
When I made the pipe out of alum, it took to long to get hot, alum transfer's heat so fast you can't get a high surface temp,
stainless isolates heat well so you can get high surface temps inside pipe, because there surface temps you can cool it quicker, giving your pipe better tunability and broader power
this is one reason some pipe combos go soft on bottom late in race as the pipe has become heat soaked and to short in tune.
This proble I had with my sled pipe, it became so soft on long pulls it would fade off 2000rpm because it lost all it's tq and couldn't pull the gear.
So pipe I built has a huge lean bog and won't rev over 7,000 until you get pipe hot, then it pulls like mule to 8300. And after long nitrious pull it doesn't fall on it's face when you let off the happy gas button!
 
Location
Ohio
I would like to test one in Va. or Daytona. I have a Waterdawg lightweight SXR hull with Yamaha motor and pump and of course a B pipe. It would be a very quick swap due to my oversize (compared to Superjet) engine compartment. It just comes right out quickly. I would love to see a shiny TNT in there and if it really did hit noticeably harder I would buy it on the spot. Just because it would finish off my only and probably last custom ski.
 

OCD Solutions

Original, Clean and Dependable Solutions
Location
Rentz, GA
Carbon pipes are too expensive and too fragile.

Depends on who makes them. I have one made by Crammit and one Made by Wamiltons, Crammit's is hands down a much better built chamber. I wouldn't say it's indestructable but I would never use the term fragile either.
 

Attachments

  • DSC01580.JPG
    DSC01580.JPG
    98.6 KB · Views: 49
  • cobalt%20mod%202%20010.jpg
    cobalt%20mod%202%20010.jpg
    351.5 KB · Views: 57
  • 100_2581.jpg
    100_2581.jpg
    63.5 KB · Views: 45
  • 100_2582.jpg
    100_2582.jpg
    56.9 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:

djkorn1

kidkornfilms
Site Supporter
Location
Cleveland Ohio
My brother has been wanting to throw that Arctic Cat motor in a standup for years...

Don't you need different cases because of the pull start?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom