Midshaft Talk - Building, Rebuilding, SN vs. RN, etc.

JetManiac

Stoked
Site Supporter
Vendor Account
Location
orlando
There seems to be alot of confusion among many freeriders about midshafts aka intermediate or short shafts.

Midshafts

All years of Yamaha Superjets (1990-2020) and Waveblaster 1's (1993-1996) have the same length of midshaft. This midshaft is unique in length and cannot be found in any other Yamaha ski or couch, except vxr650. Older SN SJ's (1990-some 1991's) have a smaller size threading on the coupler and a thinner and weaker midshaft end design, and should be avoided for higher powered builds. Also, you will not be able to swap out their smaller sized thread OEM couplers for a/m billet ones like those from ADA or RRP.

Midshafts have internal splines in the rear which mate with the splines on the driveshaft. There are 2 orings behind the splines which seal (supposed to anyway) water from getting to the splines and washing out the grease on the splines. Splines should be greased during installation because they are inaccessible after pump and midshaft are installed.


Midshaft Housings

Yamaha midshaft housings come in 2 sizes. The original smaller sized housing was only used 650cc motors on SN SuerJets from '90 thru '93.
The Waveblaster was introduced in 1993 with the 701 61x motor, and it has the larger sized housing like all Blasters. The '94-95 SN 701, '94-95 FX1 and all RN '96-20 all have 701's, and use the same larger sized midshaft housing.

Midshaft housings are made from an aluminum outer housing which is separated from the aluminum inner bearing core housing by rubber. The inner and outer housings are vulcanized to the rubber. The rubber acts as a dampener which allows the inner bearing core to flex with driveline movement.

The rubber of the SN housing is relatively thin, and can tear and separate just from vibration. The larger redesigned 701 housing has a much thicker rubber area, and separation of the rubber from aluminum generally only occurs from corrosion. The original oem housings around are also increasingly getting dry rotted and cracking due to the age of the rubber.

Housings which separate cannot be rebuilt and must be replaced.

Midshafthousingseparated2.jpg

Midshaft housingcrustyseparated.jpg


Midshaft housings have a rubber lip on the back to seal the housing to the bulkhead where they are mounted. This seal is easily damaged and can lead to bilge leaks and cavitation issues.

It is important that your midshaft seal well to the bulkhead. We prefer to add a thin bead of silicone just to the outside of the rubber lip as a secondary seal. It is a bit of extra work to remove and reinstall midshaft, but your seal to bulkhead will be assured. Bilge water cannot start corrosion and separation there either if silicone sealed.

Midshaftcrustyrear.jpg

You can see where corrosion is compromising the seal on this salty dog.
Corrosion can also pit the inner ring where the grease seal goes causing leaks there as well.

Midshaft housings have a single front grease seal followed by a sealed bearing. On the back side, there is another grease seal(same as in the front), followed by a double lipped, reinforced grease seal in the rear.

It is important to note that most of the back of your midshaft housing is underwater in use. All of the area to the inside of the rear rubber lip bulkhead seal is underwater when your ski is in the water.

Midshaft housings which are in good condition can be rebuilt to replace the bearing and seals and function like new again.

There is a fitting and hose with a zerk fitting on newer SN housings, and all the larger 701/760 housings. This is used to replace grease which is washed out over time. The grease goes between the 2 rear grease seals only. It doesn't grease the midshaft/driveshaft splines. Caution must be used when adding grease here because excessive grease added will either blow out rear seal or crack the rubber of the housing. Some just use a bolt to seal the housing here, and then add grease manually when the shaft is out of the housing for maintenance. Then you can regrease the front seal and other areas as well.
 
Last edited:

JetManiac

Stoked
Site Supporter
Vendor Account
Location
orlando
Spline overlap and midshaft press location

Midshaft press-through is critical because this helps to determine the amount of spline overlap. The factory specified amount for SJ/B1 is 19.5-20.5mm as measured between the rear of the housing (not the rear of the seal) and the rear of the shaft.



When completing a build it is important to check spline overlap, especially with a/m hulls, custom builds, and setback pumps with a/m shafts.

Degrease both driveshaft and midshaft splines first. Install and align pump. Then put a small amount of grease only at beginning of the driveshaft splines and then install midshaft. Carefully remove midshaft and check how far the grease was pushed. Sometimes you need to repeat several times but this is the only way I know to accurately check spline overlap.

If you need to press shaft farther in to correct for a spline underlap, you can add an additional washer behind midshaft coupler to maintain alignment.



Use a 42mm socket to support a SN housing to prevent damage when pressing.


JMmidshaft4.jpg
 
Last edited:

McDog

Other Administrator
Staff member
Location
South Florida
If 19.5-20.5mm is how far the midshaft should protrude from the back of the midshaft housing(on a OEM hull), what is the distance of spline overlap needed? This seems like a better measure for us aftermarket hull folks.
 

JetManiac

Stoked
Site Supporter
Vendor Account
Location
orlando
If 19.5-20.5mm is how far the midshaft should protrude from the back of the midshaft housing(on a OEM hull), what is the distance of spline overlap needed? This seems like a better measure for us aftermarket hull folks.

I don't know if there is a spec for this, but you want full engagement minus about 3/16-1/4"
 
tks Chris...one of my first jobs on a long todo list now....I cant wait...

...FYI my SF crate and BB 781 has landed in Cape Town !!!!!...got confirmation it was cleared by customs this morning....so actual collection by me will be Tuesday 3rd.......a very big ThANK YOU to you, Blue and Berky for an incredibly smooth process to get my project this far....this forum has really made a massive difference to me and is why i could drop more than 10K into a build that i have never done before, with people I have yet to meet and shake hands with....big thanks to all the X members who give their input and guidance so openly.
 

extreemthrottle

freeride junkie
Location
north palm beach
great thread chris
hey chris, got a question. you are saying the blaster and the sj use the same intermediate shafts?
i ask because the part numbers are different and i thought the length was different
also the 94/95 vxr 650 has the same part number as the blaster, and i have used one from a vxr650 in my current setup in my blaster its working great.
just curious, and trying to see if there are other skis that run the same shafts.
 

JetManiac

Stoked
Site Supporter
Vendor Account
Location
orlando
great thread chris
hey chris, got a question. you are saying the blaster and the sj use the same intermediate shafts?
i ask because the part numbers are different and i thought the length was different
also the 94/95 vxr 650 has the same part number as the blaster, and i have used one from a vxr650 in my current setup in my blaster its working great.
just curious, and trying to see if there are other skis that run the same shafts.

The B1, SJ, and VXR650 all have the same length midshafts. These are the only yamahas which use this length midshaft.
 
Location
Australia
Thanks for the info Chris.
Quick question, avoided the weaker midshaft and ordred the part. Came with a diameter of 23.75mm which I think is 5/16. The old one is 21.8 with a 1.5 pitch metric thread. Imperial diameter and metric thread (interesting). New coupler required. Is new the coupler thread the same for Cold Fusion and ADA, and does a new ADA or CF coupler going to fit on the crank shaft thread, being about 26.0mm??
 

JetManiac

Stoked
Site Supporter
Vendor Account
Location
orlando
Thanks for the info Chris.
Quick question, avoided the weaker midshaft and ordred the part. Came with a diameter of 23.75mm which I think is 5/16. The old one is 21.8 with a 1.5 pitch metric thread. Imperial diameter and metric thread (interesting). New coupler required. Is new the coupler thread the same for Cold Fusion and ADA, and does a new ADA or CF coupler going to fit on the crank shaft thread, being about 26.0mm??

The ADA or CF coupler set each has 2 different sized coupler halves. One is larger to fit your crank and one is smaller to fit the RN midshaft.
 
One more time for the illiterate people like myself....

1. 90-93 SN can use any intermediate shaft from any SJ??
2. 90-93 SN can also use VXR intermediate shaft?
3. 90-93 SN can only use 90-95 SN housing??
4. 90-93 SN can NOT use 96+ SJ housing ??

all these statements are under the assumption 650 or 701 engine (aftermarket couplers only fit larger 94+ shaft)
 

RMBC Freeride

Vintage
Site Supporter
Location
Pueblo, CO
One more time for the illiterate people like myself....

1. 90-93 SN can use any intermediate shaft from any SJ?? YES - 94-up style is preferred, thicker shaft and larger threads, A/M couplers
2. 90-93 SN can also use VXR intermediate shaft? YES, but depending on year/engine , it might be the older style shaft (not preferred). Check thread size to verify.
3. 90-93 SN can only use 90-95 SN housing?? NO - They can only use 90-93 SN Housing; 94-up are the newer style.
4. 90-93 SN can NOT use 96+ SJ housing ?? CORRECT except it is actually 94-up as mentioned above.

all these statements are under the assumption 650 or 701 engine (aftermarket couplers only fit larger 94+ shaft) CORRECT

Answers above in RED. hope that helps
 
Thanks for you help...Im still confused because of something I was told before.

90-93 housing is smaller and will only fit 90-93 because of the bolt holes, not due to internal shaft hole diameter.
therefore .....if I have a 90-93 SN....I need a 90-93 housing and only a 90-93 housing will fit with direct bolt in, and I can use newer style shaft with it.



I say all this because I am getting my brothers old SN....I think he took original midshaft and housing to use in a blaster, I guess because Im short a midshaft and housing.
He built new bigbore 701....putting it in his RN
Old 701 from RN is going to blaster
and Old 701 from blaster is going to this 90 SN
 

RMBC Freeride

Vintage
Site Supporter
Location
Pueblo, CO
Now I'm confused!
But seriously... If he WAS indeed able to use the SN housing in a Blaster, then the SN hull had to have been a 94 or 95 hull. 94/95 SN hulls use the newer style HOUSING, same as 96-up.

The '94-95 SN and all RN '96-present all have 701's and the same larger sized midshaft housing

And yes, the bolt pattern is what makes the difference. 90-93 smaller housing/bolt pattern. 94-up Newer housing larger bolt pattern.

EDIT - Measure the distance between 2 of the 3 bolt holes in your hull where the housing mounts.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom