1200ccm blaster

[JensNonsens]

this blaster 1 is for sale in Germany at the moment. it has a gp1200 motor and a seadoo spx bottom hull. I will try to get some inside pics...

 

[h2odesperado]

:bigeyes: :bigeyes:

 

[godocgo]

how much $ ?

 

[Mile9c1]

The SPX hull is wider than the blaster hull (and probably longer too).

 

[Kny21]

Its not flat bottom like WB1's either....

prolly a great race ski but won't be a surf macine.....

 

[Shonuff]

Crazy-ass Germans. :cheer:

 

[MADMAT]

:bigeyes: :bigeyes:

 

[JensNonsens]

there really are some crazy guys, the problem is those guys dont talk about there stuff. They make a big secret out of it.

I would love to show you some pictures of the blasterII with xp bottom and rxp motor with carbs on it, one guy raced last year!!! Probably the only fourstroke rxp engine with carbs crazy ****.

I ll try to get pics more pics etc...

 

[jetskier79]

maybe it's the shaved gas cap that's throwing me off....but the nose looks longer than normal. Is that where they extended the topdeck to mate with the longer spx bottom?

 

[godocgo]

it is also missing the front rubber nose piece, i think that makes it look funny as well

 

[Idok]

i see an RAD and a girdle head in teh backround...

 

[JensNonsens]

more pics.....:bigeyes:

 

[godocgo]

that is some pretty fly handywork:biggthumpup:

 

[Jet56]

That thing must hull ASS

 

[kawirider00]

i love custom fabrication

 

[Mike W]

the hull looks like a blaster hull with a seadoo pump retrofitted. cant tell 100% but i cant see fitting the spx hull on the blaster top. its badass either way.

 

[Sanford]

the hull looks like a blaster hull with a seadoo pump retrofitted. cant tell 100% but i cant see fitting the spx hull on the blaster top.

Its definately a Yamaha pump. The hull is also an X4 style hull but they had to narrow & shorten the lower half to make this work. This would certainly be much easier with an aftermarket (shell) bottom (like a bullit SD hull).

This biggest issue I see with it (in theory) is the motor location (very forward for an X4 hull) and the weight of the motor will cause far more weight on the front then was originally engineered for. This thing looks like it would be scary to turn hard around bouys. For an X4, this "looks" like 10" to 12" forward engine placement (then multiply all the extra weight).

This is certainly bad ass work.

ps. Did anyone else notice the VERY long mid-shaft that is not supported like they are on all Yamaha's. It goes right to coupler. That motor better have very stiff motor mounts because any vibration or torque with such a long shaft will get amplified at the rear bearing housing (if it even has one).

 

[Mike W]

now that i really looked at it your right about the pump. the pics of the hull are not good enough to tell what it is exactly.

 

[Mile9c1]

The bottom in back is definitely SPX style, 1996+.

 

[BlasterMaster]

This is certainly bad ass work.

ps. Did anyone else notice the VERY long mid-shaft that is not supported like they are on all Yamaha's. It goes right to coupler. That motor better have very stiff motor mounts because any vibration or torque with such a long shaft will get amplified at the rear bearing housing (if it even has one).

Its MADE IN GERMANY ./. and it works ;-)))))
That guy's buildin' some of the nicest stuff here
@Jens - M.L ? right?