SXR Trinity vs WCF footholds

BLAUPLOW

BLAUPLOW

Location
Tracy, CA
Reposting this here:
After searching and searching and searching I am throwing in the towel. Which footholds have more room in them, these will be going in my SXR. I had the trinity footholds on my sj and absolutely loved them, except had no room for padding or even turfing the top. seems like WCF footholds are the next best choice, only if they are bigger. Also, if anybody has pics of sxr's with either footholds please post em.

Here are some pics for reference of my Trinity holds, I only did not turf those areas because it would have not fit my feet as well, I wear size 10's.





 
Balduccimoto

Balduccimoto

Location
NYC/Long Island
My wcf footholds are great with my asics. Just recently started using them. I have 8mm padding top and bottom. Good fit, solid when kicked in. Also work for surf stance to kick in from the side. Great price too
 
N3vrSat1sfied

N3vrSat1sfied

Military Member
Location
Fort Worth, TX
I had trinity holds before, with atleast 2 layers of 8 on top, 1 on bottom, with size 10.5 asics. I'd get some new shoes and pad those things up, you want a nice tight kick in fit.


not my ski but here is SXR with trinity trintyholds1.jpg
 
Last edited:
WET BOX

WET BOX

STL Crew
Location
STL
I'm not sure if the holds are the same but here is my Trinity -2 ES.

I cut pad out under foot area and padded the top of the interior of the hold. I likey......

IMG_5144.jpgIMG_6084.jpgIMG_4928.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom