Whats best waterbox xm or h20 designs?

Just bought a footrocket and I need new waterbox to fit in ski. Whats the best bang for the buck. XM or h20 designs? Quality, performance,sound and easy fitment. Whats everyones preference? please help
I'm running a B-pipe with 760 motor. If that matters.
 

Draggingto

No Clue
Location
Brooklyn MI
I got to check out a H20 designs a couple of days ago, They look to be VERY well made and smaller than you would think from looking at pictures. I havent got to hear one yet so im no help there. But ive heard that they have a nice deep sound without being overly loud. If i can fit one in a Chan hull that is the box i will be going with.
 
I run the H2O in my Foot Rocket. I had to cut the inlet and outlet and weld them back the way I wanted, but I run a wierd setup, so don't let that discourage you- it's a nice waterbox and works well. I believe the newer ones have better angles anyways. I recommend them.
 

Draggingto

No Clue
Location
Brooklyn MI
Arent the XM boxes pretty loud? Not trying to be a vagina, but i dont want my poop that loud. I know the ATP box also fits in a chan and a Foot Rocket a buddy just put one in his chan and its sexy looking for a water box.
 
[quote="yamanube, post: 1575042, member: 835"[/quote]
I like them and have never had an issue with volume nor have riders around me. Construction is very sturdy and size is very small. Most recent setup was a DASA 900 stroker and the exhaust note was not obnoxious, run them in both my B1's and they sound great imo. Just a suggestion.
 
Last edited:

yamanube

This Is The Way
Staff member
Location
Mandalor
I like them and have never had an issue with volume nor have riders around me. Construction is very sturdy and size is very small. Most recent setup was a DASA 900 stroker and the exhaust note was not obnoxious, run them in both my B1's and they sound great imo. Just a suggestion.

I had one as well, the construction is good, the shape is great but it was a bit too loud, similar to the old style XM box.
 
Top Bottom