So I did some back to back testing on jetting this weekend and here is what I found...
85 pilots
135 mains
1.5 needle and seats
115 gram springs
results : Great performance but had 2 mini-seize occurrences. By this I mean after wide open throttle runs of more than 10 seconds and cutting the throttle then shutting the ski down, as the cylinders cooled faster than the pistons I believe they squeezed against the pistons locking them up. On a restart attempt only a few minutes after shut down the engine would not turn over. My theory is the 1.5 n&s's are just a shade under being able to adequately supply the fuel demands of the engine after being ported on the exhaust and cases along with having such a massive pipe to support.
Setup 2 :
85 pilots
135 mains
2.3 needle and seats
115 gram springs
Results : Again excellent performance, still easily tuned with minimal adjustment needed, no seizing conditions after a 10 second wide open run and cooling down of the engine.
Setup 3 :
Speedwerx recommended specs
105 pilots
145 mains
2.5 needle and seats
115 gram springs
Results : Much harder to tune, could not clean up certain flat spots near peak rpms, initial tuning resulted in liquid carbon pouring out of the exhaust outlet and very rough idle which again I could not tune out of it without negatively affecting other areas of the fuel circuit such as the overlap of 1/3 throttle transitioning from low to high speed circuits. The power on the top was decent but no better than setup #2, in fact a little lazy by comparison. Fuel economy was terrible too. An hour and a half ride time consumed 2/3 of a tank whereas setup 1&2 would give me respectively about 2 1/2 hours on 2/3 of a tank. My theory, Speedwerx was only going on a start out super rich basis to prevent lean failures and lean out from there. For my ski, setup #2 worked out to be the best performance on all levels.