Super Jet could be a stupid qustion, but what the hell.

[tightithrash]

so guys. i have herd from certain people that the problem with the B-pipe for power is that the manifold is at too steep of an angle.... so i thought, what would happen if you used a Power Factor style manifold and just connected a limited pipe to it? would it just be crap or, tuned correctly, could something like this create some power. keep in mind this would be for a 701- under 900.

DISCUSSSSSSSSSancake:

 

[superwetbrett]

that chamber would get super hot

 

[Billybo455]

water inject it foo

 

[227]

I would think that Factory Pipe already addressed this when they designed the B pipe. Besides would it even fit?

 

[tightithrash]

it looks like it would fit. i just wonder how it would run...

the b-pipe was designed for a 650 at the end of the day.

 

[Idok]

why not just use a powerfactor and call it a day?

 

[Breese08SJ]

How about a new chamber design that works with the existing manifold and headpipe? In the end its all a compromise, you are either going to move the power curve from the B-pipe bottom to mid type hit, to the powerfactor mid to top hit.

 

[BruceSki]

My B-pipe works fine? Sends me plenty high?

Doesn't blow couplers, and doesn't fall off.....ever

 

[tightithrash]

why not just use a powerfactor and call it a day?

because i need 5 gallons and want bottom to mid hit not mid to top and i dont want 900cc

How about a new chamber design that works with the existing manifold and headpipe? In the end its all a compromise, you are either going to move the power curve from the B-pipe bottom to mid type hit, to the powerfactor mid to top hit.

true but i feel like there is more room for more bottom to mid hit out of a pipe. it cant be so cut and dry. our problem is room in the ski.

 

[McDog]

I think you should try it and tell us.

 

[tightithrash]

any one got a manifold?

 

[BruceSki]

I think you should try it and tell us.

x2

 

[Breese08SJ]

because i need 5 gallons and want bottom to mid hit not mid to top and i dont want 900cc



true but i feel like there is more room for more bottom to mid hit out of a pipe. it cant be so cut and dry. our problem is room in the ski.

If you are looking for more bottom to mid hit I pretty sure using a dry pipe manifold is not your answer. If I am not mistaken from what i have read, the over all tuned length plays a large role in what range the power is made. If you were to used a dry pipe manifold and a B-pipe chamber that would drastically shorten the tuned length.

A custom aluminum tank wouldnt set you back that much if you were to stumble upon a better chamber design and needed a little clearance to make it fit.

 

[tightithrash]

i just think, what if there was a pipe that made the 701 rip as hard as a big motor :highhorse:

i think a 701 has way more potential than what is currently available.

 

[Idok]

i just think, what if there was a pipe that made the 701 rip as hard as a big motor :highhorse:

puff puff PASS

 

[509freerider]

You may be onto something Zack, I bet it would work great once you inject some water into the chamber! Someones got to have a manifold sitting around! WDK billet manifold would be SICK if you could get your hands on one!

 

[McDog]

Sure there is, but it requires a different crank and top end. LOL

 

[509freerider]

Sure there is, but it requires a different crank and top end. LOL

Got excited, forgot that was for the gp800

 

[tightithrash]

not a 900-1200 but like a 800.

you guys really think no way? boring....

 

[Matt_E]

Considering how you're never wrenching on your driveline while at the beach, this mod could provide the element of danger to make things exciting!
Go for it.