I really don't think you are going to have any issues with the Carbon poles. Given that it is in the same shape as the aluminum pole the comparison is relatively easy. I still don't understand the logic behind the aluminum pole other than cost cutting.
Simply by comparing two of the applicable material specifications we can see the carbon fiber is arguably better. First the strength of a material which is the force per unit area at failure, divided by its density. Any material that is strong and light has a favorable Strength/weight ratio would be good on a ski. Generally speaking Carbon fiber rates at 2457 kN.m/kg while aluminum rates at 222 kN.m/kg. We have better performance with a lighter piece of material.
Secondly we can look at the rigidity, which is resistance to bending or stretching, this would defiantly be applicable to a pole on a ski, Rigidity or stiffness of a material is measured by its Young Modulus and measures how much a material deflects under stress. Generally speaking a standard 70/30 fibre/matrix (Carbon fiber) will rate 2.5 times greater than aluminum in this respect.
I am not quite sure what CARBON is talking about but as far as I can tell, Carbon fiber will react with the aluminum matrix but only at temperatures above 500 °C
I wouldn't tell you to talk to someone who does composites for a living, talk to a material scientist (which I am not).