Engine Tech 967

Had the pleasure of ripping @jonolove ET967 powered Phantom for a week in preparation for the 2016 US Freestyle Championships. From day one I felt there was more power to be found, pump needed some tweaking. We spent 2 days with various nozzle sizes, tailcone sizes, testing. We got her dialed in the day before we expected to leave for the championship, and she was running better than ever. I really couldn't believe we where getting this kind of power from a stock stroke, stock pump combo. I am very impressed with this engine. I recommend Engine Tech engines to anyone in the market. Between the stock stroke 967 and the 10 mil version, 1107. These are very competitive engines, and Engine Tech's countless years of 2 stroke engineering really shows. If anyone has questions about this 967 combo we had, don't hesitate to pm me. I'll answer to the best of my ability. If you haven't already seen, and have an instagram account. Look me up "zachskii". I have a video posted from the day after, throwing combos down. Watch it, critique it, do what you may. Once again thank you @jonolove @sinisterjosh @E-Tech

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 

Just4Fun

First World Problems...
Location
Southern Oregon
Had the pleasure of ripping @jonolove ET967 powered Phantom for a week in preparation for the 2016 US Freestyle Championships. From day one I felt there was more power to be found, pump needed some tweaking. We spent 2 days with various nozzle sizes, tailcone sizes, testing. We got her dialed in the day before we expected to leave for the championship, and she was running better than ever. I really couldn't believe we where getting this kind of power from a stock stroke, stock pump combo. I am very impressed with this engine. I recommend Engine Tech engines to anyone in the market. Between the stock stroke 967 and the 10 mil version, 1107. These are very competitive engines, and Engine Tech's countless years of 2 stroke engineering really shows. If anyone has questions about this 967 combo we had, don't hesitate to pm me. I'll answer to the best of my ability. If you haven't already seen, and have an instagram account. Look me up "zachskii". I have a video posted from the day after, throwing combos down. Watch it, critique it, do what you may. Once again thank you @jonolove @sinisterjosh @E-Tech

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

What kind of exhaust were you running?
 
Location
Mesa AZ
anyone run 44s on one of these?
spent all my $$ on the 967 and wont be able to afford big boy carbs for awhile

I'm in the same boat. I talked to Art at ET, he was extremely nice to deal with. He said with a b-pipe and 44mm carbs, and a stock 144 pump, you will still see about 20-30 HP increase over the 701. His almost exact words when asked if b-pipe and 44s will work with this engine and make good power were, "absolutely, it'll do great. You'll just add another 35 HP or so when adding powerfactor pipe and proper carbs."
Hope that helps ease your mind, it did for me!
 
If you put that impeller in a pitch gauge it would probably read somewhere around 17/21 or so is what I'm guessing. If it read 5/10 it would cavitate like crazy with a stock 701. I understand Dave calls it a 5/10 and Daves a super nice guy and Dave knows his stuff and I cant buy it off the shelf.
 
If you put that impeller in a pitch gauge it would probably read somewhere around 17/21 or so is what I'm guessing. If it read 5/10 it would cavitate like crazy with a stock 701. I understand Dave calls it a 5/10 and Daves a super nice guy and Dave knows his stuff and I cant buy it off the shelf.

You are correct, different manufactures and different style impellers get measured differently. So in reality it is an impros 5/10 if that makes more sense


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom