Filling Crossover

waxhead

wannabe backflipper
Location
gold coast
mate crossover is a bad thing and will send your sister to the whore house and your mum to the Brothel.
your sister will end up the mother of your two headed children
yes people its thats bad
 
Last edited:

smusleh

JetSkiExtrm
Location
MI
IMO....It would also depend on if your cases have dual pulse. If not, then it is not worth filling the crossover.
 

Matt_E

steals hub caps from cars
Site Supporter
Location
at peace
Love that stuff. I've used it for building ramps in 62T cases before. It has held up great and was easy to use.
 
John at JSS holds the opinion that filling in the crossover reduces bottom end hit. He states he has done testing on the same ski by switching manifolds,one filled crossover and the other stock. He has found that the crossover helps low speed carb signal greatly and bottom end hit...This is contrary to opinion held by many threads on here, anyone believe this ?
If you read what GroupK, etc say about filling crossover, they are only worried about deteriorating WOT signal. A crossover on a twin cylinder is in place of a boostbottle on a single cylinder. It cleans up low speed carburetion, delivering more power on the low-end, same reason some like to run a single carb on a twin.
 

Matt_E

steals hub caps from cars
Site Supporter
Location
at peace
John at JSS holds the opinion that filling in the crossover reduces bottom end hit. He states he has done testing on the same ski by switching manifolds,one filled crossover and the other stock. He has found that the crossover helps low speed carb signal greatly and bottom end hit...This is contrary to opinion held by many threads on here, anyone believe this ?

That begs the question if he rejetted/tuned the carbs when he switched back and forth.
 

SXIPro

JM781 Big Bore
That begs the question if he rejetted/tuned the carbs when he switched back and forth.

Exactly right. You absolutely must rejet if you fill the crossover, at least on stock 38s. If not you will have a low speed stumble or hesitation. Ask me how I know.

To me it wasn't worth it. I yanked the filled one and threw my stocker back on. So if anyone wants to buy a stock manifold with the crossover nicely filled...send me a PM. :)
 
I did some testing on this yesterday. I made custom crossover on my SXR 800 engine with 48mm annular discharge carbs, made a big difference on acceleration, (and yes my carbs were jetted correctly before I did this)
Got the slight whiplash today to prove it
 
I did some testing on this yesterday. I made custom crossover on my SXR 800 engine with 48mm annular discharge carbs, made a big difference on acceleration, (and yes my carbs were jetted correctly before I did this)
Got the slight whiplash today to prove it

So are you saying your ski had better bottom end by adding a crossover ?
 
So are you saying your ski had better bottom end by adding a crossover ?

Yes, much better
If you read the research done by companies/engineers, they all say it gives cleaner/better response which is what we are after. A GroupK article refers to the downside of deteriorating signal at prolonged WOT, something that won't affect a freestyle machine. All the AM manifolds were originally made for racing
Eric Malone keeps the cross-over setup on the backflipping Q8 with SXR motor, I think he knows more than most of us
 
Last edited:

Schmidty721

someone turf my rails
Location
WI
Yes, much better
If you read the research done by companies/engineers, they all say it gives cleaner/better response which is what we are after. A GroupK article refers to the downside of deteriorating signal at prolonged WOT, something that won't affect a freestyle machine. All the AM manifolds were originally made for racing
Eric Malone keeps the cross-over setup on the backflipping Q8 with SXR motor, I think he knows more than most of us

When you say you added a "cross-over" what exactly did you add? Is it an external piece, ie one boost bottle connected to both intake ports?
 
Yes, much better
If you read the research done by companies/engineers, they all say it gives cleaner/better response which is what we are after. A GroupK article refers to the downside of deteriorating signal at prolonged WOT, something that won't affect a freestyle machine. All the AM manifolds were originally made for racing
Eric Malone keeps the cross-over setup on the backflipping Q8 with SXR motor, I think he knows more than most of us

again this is what John at Jetskisolutions believes strongly...He states that we all are making a big mistake by filling in the crossover...we are losing bottom end hit.
 
Connecting the two cylinders will make the power delivery smoother, and you lose the capabilities to individually tune each cylinder. This works best on a "single carb application" This is what I found with testing, so its based on my opinion only.

Regards,
Randy
 
Connecting the two cylinders will make the power delivery smoother, and you lose the capabilities to individually tune each cylinder. This works best on a "single carb application" This is what I found with testing, so its based on my opinion only.

Regards,
Randy

I have played with individual carb settings a lot, eventually landed up with the best setting I could get. Perfect acceleration was there but at constant low throttle position it was rich which is needed for rapid throttle opening as no accelerator pump. Adding the crossover cleared the rich constant low speed and I only had to open the high speed screws a bit. If you read the Y.E.I.S. technical paper, they speak about the torque dip just before the motor comes on the pipe due to pulses from exhaust affecting scavenging. They also state that there is less effect with a PV motor. A crossover relieves the pulse to the other cylinder while the boostbottle stores that pulse and returns it back to that cylinder.
Just my findings from researching and testing on my ski
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom