IMO along with P&Ps comments, i agree. Most that have not back to backed carbs would not know the difference. Dasa carbs are a great deal. I do not get "hooked up" any more by either. The Dasa's are less expensive. That being said i currently run a set of P&P tuned 49 ALVR 6's from 2017. There are differences to all of the FS carbs. Most don't notice, or couldn't tell. The newest ALVR7s with the shifted booster seem to add more top. still not sure if it affects bottom end or not. The Dasa is easier to tune, as the screws can be changed more. The FS prefer certain settings, once you know that the FS are just as easy to tune as the Dasa. I prefer the FS as once set they are set. I also prefer them because of Eds friendship, the time he spends with me tuning, and the attention to detail he does specific carbs for each of my builds designing what i am asking for. Kyle on the other hand is a good friend as well and makes awesome carbs. I wouldn't hesitate to run either.
IMO this is not an apples to apples comparison. To some it will be, therefore you cannot debate this question with someone who hasn't understood all the variables to the debate.
FYI, FS are available in full bore so that they don't neck down internally. Not saying you want or need them, but stating apples to apples. You can order any thing you like made from FS. Most other make one carb. Also part of the confusion with customer tailored parts as they enter the used market. FYI 49-50 mm ALVR7s on a stock stroke 700 series motor. Not a good match.