By my post above, I meatn electrical superchargers wouldnt work.
you would need a generator the size of a VW bug to make enough energy to electrically actually over come atmospheric pressure on a 701 engine intake.
superchargers... yeah, they bolt on the engine, and use the engines power to spin them, ever seen the belt on a 6/71 blower? I figure its rated for 80HP or so ( the belt)
im sure in the upper RPMS there is an advantage with the supercharger, but Id bet it taxes the bejeesus out of the engine all of the rest of the time.
dragsters use them, in a VERY precise and narrow focused use.
regardless, yeah im no physcisit, but I can tell you there is more to it then strapping a leafblower to the intake.
hell why not ad some of those "hydrogen generators" to the setup too?
and then run some slick50, and octane booster.
\might be able to get 400 HP out of a 701.
We all understand that you cannot get out more energy than put in, its a very commonly known law of physics.
But I digress, your interpretation of the law is very flawed. By your interpretation superchargers in general would not work, as they would take more mechanical force to produce a chanrge than the charge would improve compustion. As we all know superchargers do in-fact work every day. As for an electric one working, that would come down to the jet skis charging system efficiency and the efficiency of the leaf blower.
I think the OP was talking about a 2 stroke Leaf blower though.