Super Jet modded superjet hp?

[Marco_l87]

Hey guys,
just out of curiosity I came up with this question: how many hp does my modded superjet have?

-stock 701
-stock carbs (adjusted for bpipe)
-ada head, 35cc domes
-v-force 2
-b pipe
-msd enhancer

I know it's totally useless to know "the number", idc about how many hp it has, it's just ok if I FEEL them but when someone asks me this question I never know how to reply...
I know it has 70hp completely stock, but mine?
Thanksss

 

[Big Kahuna]

Gonna say about 82-85 hp.

 

[Marco_l87]

whoa, I thought about 95 LOL!
what about if it had a 760? or with aftermarket carbs?

 

[Th3g3rm4n4t0r]

whoa, I thought about 95 LOL!
what about if it had a 760? or with aftermarket carbs?

Stock 760 is 90hp.

Fully modded anywhere between 100-115hp.

then again everyone likes the 62T/61X 701 setup for freestyle, your motor could have say 82-85hp like @Big Kahuna said. but at a different powerband then the other... For instance the 701 based 61x motors have more low end power and the 62t has a higher end power range. This is because of the port timings.. Ones higher or lower etc.

 

[Marco_l87]

ahhhh understood! thank you for your exaustive reply!!

 

[FlightPlanDan]

Stock 96 thru 07 = 79 hp. From the factory.
Means nothing.
The best motor in the world sux if the pump sux. HP to the prop is not measurable. Therefore, HP means nothing.
Include the pump and it's specs: means nothing after a ride or two. Wear ring has changed, all has changed.

Horsepower numbers are only good for bragging rights.
50 hp sea-doo's go way faster than 79 hp sj's. It all means nothing.

Motor/pump combo's still can't be measured.

My advise:
Lie.
Tell them you have 1000 hp governed for recreational use. And that the world is not ready for what your motor has to offer.
And that, if you were to release the demon within your engine compartment, the world would cease to exist and suck backwards through the black hole created by the time/space warping it caused, resulting in the instantaneous death of all life on the planet of origin. That would be Earth.

Therefore, I'd do my best to make the ski run well, and not worry about the ever-so-dangerous horse power that it might produce.

Just my opinion.

 

[yamijumpn]

It could be beneficial to put a ski in some sort of rig that could measure the force the ski pulls at given rpms. Then could change pipes, jets etc and compare engine rpm vs thrust the engine is putting to the pump. Should give a good curve when the thrust of your engine comes in .

 

[Quinc]

[QUOTE="FlightPlanDan, post: 1824842, member: ]

Motor/pump combo's still can't be measured.

[/QUOTE]
Measured in thrust.

You can also measure power at the pump.

http://www.dynomitedynamometer.com/pwc-dyno/pwc-dyno.htm

 

[yamijumpn]

my idea was a bit more backyardish. constant supply of water from a huge tank and something to hold the ski in place while measuring its pulling/pushing force. Tank would give the pump plenty of water flow, that dyno seems like it relies on internal water resistance. prob pretty limited power wise either way sweet idea!

 

[Quinc]

my idea was a bit more backyardish. constant supply of water from a huge tank and something to hold the ski in place while measuring its pulling/pushing force. Tank would give the pump plenty of water flow, that dyno seems like it relies on internal water resistance. prob pretty limited power wise either way sweet idea!

That dymo claims it can measure up to 250hp.

What you are talking about:

 

[Vumad]

Measured in thrust.

You can also measure power at the pump.

http://www.dynomitedynamometer.com/pwc-dyno/pwc-dyno.htm

Is that some sort of static test? It doesn't look like you can ride the boat while testing. Centrifugal pumps make huge gains from the intake. You won't get an accurate flow reading from a boat while the parked. It has to be ridden.