@Big Kahuna this has not been done several times, removing the INNER chamber in PFP and run the outer and larger volumen chamber as wet pipe?
I have never seen it on the X, nor heard about it here
I did hear about it from a Aussie guy, i think he reeds here sometimes, runs a KDX with TPE 1105, said it made huge difference going from inner chamber wet, to outer chamber wet.
One of our guys in our riding group just made 2 pipes out of his, he has only testet the inner chamber, hope we soon get a review on the bigger outer chamber.
Will also get a picture of the outer chamber welded back together.
@AdzUK Did you guys test this back to back?
View attachment 342903View attachment 342902View attachment 342901View attachment 342900
soo powerband just moves up ?I've done this on other pipes. I had stampings for various dry pipes over the years and welded up some outers.
Results: The powerband for the same given motor size moves up considerably. You can play with Compression, Timing, water, and Stinger size to some extent but your not going to get a majority of whats gone back. "for the same given motor size"
soo powerband just moves up ?
soo you did not pick up more power longer power etc etc ???Yes. If it’s exact same motor size. Sometime to point of no return. I was dealing with under 800cc motors. Not giants that pump more air
soo you did not pick up more power longer power etc etc ???
i have and you a correct, seemes like more pro freestyler goe wet pipe. With multibel injection pointsYes more top end. Have you even seen a FPP type 8? That volume is huge compared to a B pipe. It’s still the king of Dyno HP for given 800cc superjet engine. type 9 was developed because it didn’t have the low end riders wanted. Also the tapers get screwed up a little because most manifolds don’t get cut in half and made bigger to match.