You got some good points and aspects Chuck
@Nuklear6 - how are you recovering by the way?
@Christian_83 im getting better every day physically, dealing with some other minor issues that have kept me from working yet. But very hopeful ill be back soon. Thank you very much for asking it honestly means alot.
These cranks are definitely about changing weight with out affecting crank case volume and primary compression. They mention being able to change crank weight by about 2 lbs but no comparison to stock weight. Other light weight cranks on the market are almost 2 lbs lighter then stock weight and are built with material placement to keep proper balance percentage. Even though i dont build crankshafts ive worked extensively on high reving singles and adjusting balance percentages. Remember the top of the connecting rod, top bearing, wrist pin, piston, rings and clip weight are reciprocating mass not rotating mass. There for there effect/weight on the crankshaft changes at different degrees of the crankshaft rotation.
I still stand by this being a great idea and am not bashing. I just hope ADR was able to address changing web weight and only slightly effecting the balance rate.
I have capability to dynamic spin balance small cranks like this for r&d if anyone ever needed. It would cost some but not a lot. Only down fall is crank has to be pressed together and trued with no connecting rods on it. Then weights clamped the to rod pins. This is why it is more for r&d and crank design then worth doing to every crank assembly.
Sorry that got long
Chuck Palmucci
CPT Enterprise LLC
609 510 3062