An x2 top deck would have been a better option for sure.Cheap perfume on an ugly ski. Why not invest in a better looking upper deck on current 1500. This will sell about as good as the Doo 3d.
Maybe but that article also says KTM might have the answer, problem is KTM just went bellyup.Never say never...
Kawasaki is Developing a New Two-Stroke Engine, But There’s a Catch
Two-strokes could be set for a revival by Kawasaki, which has filed patent documents for a new enginewww.visordown.com
Went to World Finals 2016, the SXR was introduced that same week. A friend who has been racing forever, use to work for Laser Jet told me from conversations about the New SXR about why it is big as it is. They hulls have to pass a "Float Test". With the weight of the new engine, in a smaller hull it failed. This hull size came about so it would pass sad test. I would imagine if the SJ came with the 1800 motor, it would be similar in size. But because the 1050 / TR1 Engine has a lighter weight, the hull is a bit smaller.I'm still waiting for a reasonable answer as to why they chose to create a standup yacht. The whole point of a standup was to be small, light, challenging to learn but extremely fun learning. I started out on a rental 440 with zero experience and loved it so much I became the most common regular at the rental place. It was a boat load of fun learning, not powerful at all but that's what made it fun because falling off didn't hurt at 27 mph lol. I think to promote more standup sales they need to go backwards in time, make them small and nimble, LIGHT, not this abomination of an ocean liner, and if possible get a little 2-stroker back in there. With the advances in 2-stroke tech now and electrical reliability, I'm sure they can do it. Learners need something easy, small, light and fun to learn on before going full scale. I would bet a Coke on making smaller units again that kids and adults could learn on and really have a lot of fun with would bring back a lot of attention and sales to the standup market. This push to abandon beginner models has something to blame for a dried up interest in standup skis.
If they made a small beginner class ski though with a small motor that should pass no? I can see the point of the float test, and maybe the new standards of it require the hull to have a positive buoyancy vs. how the 2-stroke SuperJet would float but just barely bobbing at the surface. I saw a neat video of how they float like that but I can see how it would be just like a waterlogged driftwood. I'll try to find that video but it was kind of reassuring that the SJ wasn't going to torpedo down when subbed.Went to World Finals 2016, the SXR was introduced that same week. A friend who has been racing forever, use to work for Laser Jet told me from conversations about the New SXR about why it is big as it is. They hulls have to pass a "Float Test". With the weight of the new engine, in a smaller hull it failed. This hull size came about so it would pass sad test. I would imagine if the SJ came with the 1800 motor, it would be similar in size. But because the 1050 / TR1 Engine has a lighter weight, the hull is a bit smaller.
Kawi didnt have a smaller motor. They have the 12F and 15F platforms which are the same size if not mistaken.If they made a small beginner class ski though with a small motor that should pass no? I can see the point of the float test, and maybe the new standards of it require the hull to have a positive buoyancy vs. how the 2-stroke SuperJet would float but just barely bobbing at the surface. I saw a neat video of how they float like that but I can see how it would be just like a waterlogged driftwood. I'll try to find that video but it was kind of reassuring that the SJ wasn't going to torpedo down when subbed.
Yes physical dimensions of the engines are the same.Kawi didnt have a smaller motor. They have the 12F and 15F platforms which are the same size if not mistaken.
Exactly that Rotax 600 weighs about 90lbs , I am also seeing some 85 HP figures posted for it.I think the 650SX was only around 50hp too