PHP 898 Review

RMBC Freeride

Vintage
Site Supporter
Location
Pueblo, CO
I'd like to share my experience that I’ve had with @powerhouseperformance, specifically their 898 billet cylinder engine. (Short story, this thing is absolutely ripping now!)

First off, I’m posting this because I hated to see some of the recent bad publicity that has been expressed by another member here. However, I can relate because I went through some of the same issues, but I got them worked out and I’m very happy now...

I think the key to the PHP is following Zack's setup to the "T". period. His setup is dialed. Any deviation from that setup will lead to additional tuning. Trust me, I know... I've been there. More on that below. EDIT/RANT: This is true for ANY high-end, big cc, "back flip" motor. I'm not sure why other people here seem to think that because the initial price of the PHP is lower, that they can use sub-par parts and get the phenomenal results that they see posted by the PHP crew! PAY TO PLAY - be it DASA, TPE or X-Scream. And while I'm on this subject, you can't BUY a backflip... it takes SKILL, which comes with practice. Just look at all the recent threads of guys looking for backflip critique and advice... some of these guys have killer skis with top-notch hulls and big motors, and they are looking for help to make it all around. I think some guys get disappointed when they spend a lump of cash and dont get an instant FW backflip... anyway... /RANT

I was attracted to the price, performance and philosophy behind the PHP 898. And much like another member here (who expressed some disappointment in this engine), I bought it and did not follow Zack's recipe. And I spent nearly a year of frustration getting it to where it's rocking now! By my own admission (and due to my budget), I didn't follow his setup and it caused me to have to do a lot more tuning.

For the record, here is what I did:
  • I had Zack build me a 5mm version of his 898. (Because I had a brand-new crank on hand).When Zack got the crank he advised me that it was very heavy compared to his 4mm billet. - I said go ahead and use my 5mm (budget). It bears noting that this was also before the new light-weight pistons that he uses now. My engine came out to 940cc with the piston size that I chose. Zack cautioned me that it might not spool up as quickly due to this crank.
  • I used 48mm Full Spectrum carbs - Zack prefers Novi 48's
  • I (gasp) used a B-pipe headpipe with a TNT stroker chamber. - NO PFP in my budget. Zack doesn’t like the performance of the TNT chamber and still tells me that I should run anything else but that! (again, my budget, stubbornness and experience with the TNT have caused me to not follow his recommendations)
  • Race gas compression domes - custom cut for 940cc and elevation. (also got a second 50/50 mix set)
  • I ran it in a Carbon superfreak Badass hull - with a "heavy" surf layup (68 lbs). Pushing a 144 Solas pump with various impellers and nozzle bore. Never could get it to hit right or hook up consistently with this setup. No matter which impeller. (This has caused me to question the viability of this Solas stator section in any high-end setup.)
  • MSD T/L - I actually followed Zack's advice on this part (sort-of, read on below)
  • ****** Oh one last thing - I'm AT 4700' ELEVATION! It's an uphill battle to get things tuned right here where I’m losing 14% to 20% of my horsepower on any given day! *****
All that being said, I was feeling much the same as the other member here. The engine ripped on top-end, but didn't have the hit or hook-up out of the hole that I expected. I wanted it to scare me and rip out of my hands. I made many calls and texts to Zack, changed jetting many times. He was always available and willing to help, but not much change no matter what we tried. Finally, at the end of the season, before going to Pismo freeride, I de-tuned it, put MSD enhancer, less timing, less compression and basically set it up as a surf engine… And it was unbelievable at sea-level, even detuned. More than enough power for surf, super linear and incredible pull when needed. Totally wore me out! Inspired me to figure it out over the winter, make some changes, etc...

Fast forward to this year - made some Major changes over the winter: Some to follow Zack's Recipe and some still not. Still on a budget - and confident that the potential is yet to be seen in this PHP mill!

Switched to Novi 48's
Switched to 155 setback 14V mag, prop pitched to 7/14
Switched into a carbon Circus hull
same TNT pipe, much to Zack’s dismay
lower compression domes 50/50 pump gas/race gas – also not recommended by Zack.

First ride out was too rich. Leaned out and it was fun but still not explosive. So I went ahead and cranked up my timing to what Zack had originally recommended... WOW!!!! Holy poop WOW!!!
These engines like a lot of timing. And with that timing they need a lot of fuel down low. I bumped my timing only 2 deg. higher than where I was at and it came to life. Should have had it there all along... should have listened to Zack!

And this is with lower compression and the "wrong" pipe, and a heavy crank and pistons! Oh and of course 4700 feet elevation! From this I got my first flatwater flips – finally!

So I'd say there is a very easy way to make this engine rip - follow PHP's setup exactly (and be near sea-level)! Otherwise, like any other high-end setup, it takes the right combo of parts and tuning to get an engine dialed.

Hope that helps others that are considering a PHP setup. Zack has been super helpful all-around and I can’t thank him enough for that. This is a solid package at a great price. The crazy thing is that I don’t even have this cranked all the way up yet – I can still go to the light crank and pistons, bump up my compression, get a PFP, and add the oxygenated VP113 fuel that Zack recommends… and get even more power! At this point I don’t need it. Totally satisfied…. For now :D

7ehupy5a.jpg
 
Last edited:

Byeai

"Cheetos-Man"
Location
Melbourne FL
I've got a
Carbon chan
Php898
Novi48
Msd total loss
144 solas
Pfp
Php intake and vforce 3 reeds
This motor hits hard I love it never had a issue did exactly what zack said and it works
I can barely get it around but I've had lucas and anyzeski and leftly do multiple flips and rolls

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
 

clouse22

BDB Kustomz
Site Supporter
Location
Lake Orion, MI
Congrats on getting your ski set up good.

x2...nice write up

i got a chance to ride Zachs personal ski last year and just yesterday a buddy of mines php 898 that he has in his dvx. This would be my choice of motor if i wasn't so happy with my my xscream motor

zach is a nice guy and his customer service and work speak for itself
 
I'm running a 4mill light crank 898.
B pipe
Epic ignition (zacks curve)
Stock set of 46's.
144 pump in a heavy FS1 rickter. I know I'm leaving some power on the table with my carb and pipe set up but for my style of riding I'm extremely happy with it. Came from a 781 set up last season and there is a big difference between the two. Would love to get this set up into a lighter hull someday but not sure if it will ever happen or not.

I told Zack what my set up was gonna be and he was able to get me a baseline for everything that was pretty close. It only took some minor tweaking on my end to get it running real good.
 
Location
PNW
I'd like to share my experience that I’ve had with @powerhouseperformance, specifically their 898 billet cylinder engine. (Short story, this thing is absolutely ripping now!)

First off, I’m posting this because I hated to see some of the recent bad publicity that has been expressed by another member here. However, I can relate because I went through some of the same issues, but I got them worked out and I’m very happy now...

I think the key to the PHP is following Zack's setup to the "T". period. His setup is dialed. Any deviation from that setup will lead to additional tuning. Trust me, I know... I've been there. More on that below. EDIT/RANT: This is true for ANY high-end, big cc, "back flip" motor. I'm not sure why other people here seem to think that because the initial price of the PHP is lower, that they can use sub-par parts and get the phenomenal results that they see posted by the PHP crew! PAY TO PLAY - be it DASA, TPE or X-Scream. And while I'm on this subject, you can't BUY a backflip... it takes SKILL, which comes with practice. Just look at all the recent threads of guys looking for backflip critique and advice... some of these guys have killer skis with top-notch hulls and big motors, and they are looking for help to make it all around. I think some guys get disappointed when they spend a lump of cash and dont get an instant FW backflip... anyway... /RANT

This is the only engine that I have seen that needs to follow a particular setup to a "T" to be successful. Am I the only one that sees this?
 

powerhouseperformance

www.PHPSKI.com
Site Supporter
Location
wisconsin
This is the only engine that I have seen that needs to follow a particular setup to a "T" to be successful. Am I the only one that sees this?
The higher performance the engine the more critical it is have the right other supporting setup. The PHP motor is no harder to tune than any other high performance big bore engine. When you get this far away from what a stock 701 started as it's important you maintain balance with the rest of the parts. A v8 race car with a big cam is always going to be a bit more finicky to tune than your grandpa's v8 pickup truck. Comming from the jet ski racing world we are all about maximum performance, no compromises in our engines. We build our 898's for guys who want the most out of their 900cc engines without having to jeopardize reliability by going to a longer stroke bigger cc engine.
 
Last edited:

RMBC Freeride

Vintage
Site Supporter
Location
Pueblo, CO
Oh boy, here we go... I knew somebody was going to take my comment literally and turn it around on PHP. I'm sorry Zack if that turned into a negative, was not meant to be. My engine rips and I am not following the exact "to the T" setup!

Let's examine MY comment in MY post which is MY opinion "I think the key to the PHP is following Zack's setup to the "T". period"
That is just MY opinion... a guy who spent hard earned money to get this engine. Several others have posted above with different setups and are very happy as well. I was simply trying to say that the shortest path to success is going with the shop's preferred setup -

Do you think that if you call up X-scream and buy a 1200R from them, then use (as an example) an enhancer, dasa carbs, a stock pump and pump gas, you are gonna get performance that Jace and Stoyer and Ant are getting? No way! If you want X-screams whole package - you pay the price, follow what they recommend "to the T" and get the power. Anything less will be a compromise in some way. Will they help you with it, yes. Will they guarantee 20ft high backflips like Jace? NO!

So how is this any different? Why is PHP held to a different standard? Because they are less expensive? Don't have a pro team?

Again I'm sorry if MY comments came off as a negative towards the PHP package - Mine is running great, it is not following the preferred setup, I am happy with it as are others. I just relayed my experiences. I consider my self a pretty seasoned tuner and yet I made mistakes by not following Zacks advice. Could happen with any engine/engine builder... just MY opinion. Take it for what it's worth.
 
I don't see any of the parts you have as Being sub par. And at 1 point in time those parts were considered top of the line. Just because they came out with a revamped b pipe "RRP" doesn't make the parts you have preform any less.
 
Location
PNW
RMBC, you're way off target. I'm not "turning" anything around, just stating the obvious; It appears that there's only one setup to run with this engine package and I think it's important for people to know that prior to making their decision. Consider how much time, money and frustration this information would save people that are going to run this setup.

I'm not hating, but I sure don't appreciate how the fanboy's dogpile anyone having issues with this engine and dare ask for help on here.
 

powerhouseperformance

www.PHPSKI.com
Site Supporter
Location
wisconsin
RMBC, you're way off target. I'm not "turning" anything around, just stating the obvious; It appears that there's only one setup to run with this engine package and I think it's important for people to know that prior to making their decision. Consider how much time, money and frustration this information would save people that are going to run this setup.

I'm not hating, but I sure don't appreciate how the fanboy's dogpile anyone having issues with this engine and dare ask for help on here.
This is far from the truth. We have guys running b pipes, charging systems, and something other than the usual 48's with great results. They run great on a bunch of different setups. If you want it to be a flat water monster no problem, we can set you up with that. You want to run it in a surf boat no problem we can get a setup for that to. Heck Blue ran one in his own personal ski with stock 46mm carbs and an epic with a charging system and he loved it. He said hands down it outperformed the other billet motor he pulled out before it. All this negativity lately seems to stem from some guy wit in Ohio who can't build his boat to work right. We even offered to tune it for him if he came up to the shop last summer. He didn't take us up on that because complaining on the internet is far easier...
We certainly don't jump on people who ask for help. Quite the contrary. Ask anyone who has called the shop for tuning advice and I'm sure they will agree we spend as long as they need to get to the bottom of whatever they have going. Man, guys wonder why other engine builders don't post on the X anymore...
 

SpaceCowboy

breaking something
Zack is the man!...I have called him numerous times about tuning and working through some ski motor issues...funny thing is I have never bought a thing from him. When I am ready for an arm yanker though I know who I will call for sure. If you get a chance to talk to him you will completely understand his knowledge and passion for the sport. Also if you haven't ridden a ski with a PHP898 you should!
 
Lol you don't have to say some guy in Ohio you can say 102nd7, or even my real name Timothy Piatt. It just seems kinda sketchy when you say it that way. Kind of a way to escape accountability. Or maybe there is others in Ohio unimpressed.
 

River Rat

Squarenosed
Location
USA
^^^ yeah I bet your not the only one who is un happy with there php 898 but like ive always said before once someone like you posts there honest opinion then you become the bad person and everyone supporting that company comes and attacks you so im 100% sure there are a few others who would rather keep it hush.. he says blue had a php and claimed hands down was better then any other billet motor but yet blue had his for sale so does that mean blues done riding? Eh doubt it im sure he just wanted to test out the motor and wasnt to his likings.
 
Top Bottom