The FBI needs to be shut down

and lets not forget the atf while we are at it. enforcing unconstitutional and "made-up" rules like they are laws just to turn law-abiding citizens into criminals and robbing them at gunpoint


the corruption goes well beyond the fbi...it reaches all 3 letter orgs that seek to increase their reach and power to justify their inflated budgets
 
Last edited:

WFO Speedracer

A lifetime ban is like a lifetime warranty !
Location
Alabama
I don't want to hear about any agency hiring more agents, why you ask, it's simple really it a continuous loop, you hire more agents then you have to collect more money to meet the increased payroll, then you hire more agents so you can collect more money to pay the bigger payroll then you hire more agents to collect more money to pay the bigger payroll, its business school 101 or watermelon truck theory over and over again to Infinium . As Hank Jr would put it, they were getting screwed but they weren't getting kissed.
 

WFO Speedracer

A lifetime ban is like a lifetime warranty !
Location
Alabama
It occurred to me that not everyone is from the South and as such may not have any idea about the Watermelon truck theory so for those guys here you go :

Two geniuses from Texas got bad sales advice when they decided that they were going to go to Mexico and load up their pickup truck with watermelons for a buck a piece and come back across the border and drive to Dallas where they were going to sell those watermelons for $10 a dozen.
Steve Clark on Sales Advice


Before they got halfway to Dallas, they sold out of their watermelons. As they were sitting alongside the road counting their money, it occurred to them that they had collected less money from the sale of $10 a dozen watermelons than they had actually paid in Mexico at a dollar apiece.

No problem for these two geniuses who came to the resounding conclusion that their problem was they just needed a bigger truck so they could sell more watermelons.

Now, before you laugh, that is how a lot of people in business think.

They think they can make up for lack of margin by increasing volume. Now the only one that really believes that are the professors to teach economy 101 in universities.

BTW I can't say anything about Texas as I never been there but around here Watermelons fetch about ten bucks a piece.

You cannot make up for low margin by selling more stuff.

A lot of people don’t believe this and try it. They think if they cut prices,” if we cut prices we’re going to make up for it in margin”. It just never works out that people are able to sell more at a lower margin to make up for the differential of cutting their prices and cutting their margins.

Now you know one of the main reasons 16 out of 17 businesses that are started each year fail.
Plainly said, the people who started them are idiots and deserve to fail.

The difficulty of accepting this as fact is the issue that next week there is another idiot that thinks he can do the same thing. And he jumps into your business and he does the same thing until he runs out of money.

The following week there is another and then another….

You are always going to have idiots competing against you who are going to undercut price and sell stuff for less than what it costs them to actually provide that service.

You are not going to eliminate that reality.

If you are going to stay in business and be competitive, you’re going to have to learn how to compete at a higher price point and ultimately become a more skilled sales professional so that you can compete against those lowball competitors that are not going to be there for the long haul.

You may have been conditioned that people are buying on price because everybody is running around undercutting it only to realize six months, a year, two years down the road that those people are no longer in business.

This strategy didn’t work for Kmart. It didn’t work for Woolworths, and it will ultimately not work for Wal-Mart and it will not work for you. Woolworths went out of business, Kmart is pretty much out of business and Wal-Mart, if they don’t change the way they are going about doing things and appeal to the more affluent at a higher price point, they will go out of business by trying to compete on low price.

The truth is that ultimately, you and your company will go out of business over the long haul if you try to compete strictly on price and become the low-ball or the low-price provider in your particular market.

It just does not work.
 
Location
Stockton
I don't want to hear about any agency hiring more agents, why you ask, it's simple really it a continuous loop, you hire more agents then you have to collect more money to meet the increased payroll, then you hire more agents so you can collect more money to pay the bigger payroll then you hire more agents to collect more money to pay the bigger payroll, its business school 101 or watermelon truck theory over and over again to Infinium . As Hank Jr would put it, they were getting screwed but they weren't getting kissed.

A CPA I follow had given a report on the bill with the IRS hiring. Btw, Iam not a proponent of hiring more additional agents…hiring to replace retires is ok.. Anyways from memory, the hiring was over a period of 10 years, starts off slow and ramps up thru the years, importantly he also had the number of agents expected to retire in each year and was able to subtract retires from the new hire number and reconcile the 10 year period. Think he also said there are not 80k out there to hire and some future hires haven’t entered collage yet

He said it’s not as bad as they make it sound but they are adding additional agents over time.. the bad part is corporations, have teams of lawyers to protect them and there returns are 8,000 pages long or a 3 foot tall stack of paper. So agents can’t go thru all that so the agents and IRS will be targeting us regular foke :(
 

OCD Solutions

Original, Clean and Dependable Solutions
Location
Rentz, GA
Yeah, I'm not looking forward to declaring my paypal income for the first time ever. I tried to lay low but pegged the threshold mid January so it is what it is. It's a drop in the bucket as far as my total income goes so I can't see it shrinking my return by much.

FYI, I was digging for information on the original case that started this thread and didn't realize it was well over a year old already. Of course the case against the FBI was dismissed, (convenient, cause you know that can of worms is way too big to open) and apparently there was always a plan to return items.

Regarding the unreturned items, Eimiller said that agents "outlined evidence of widespread criminal wrongdoing in court filings while establishing a simple procedure to return safeguarded contents to box holders who were not otherwise subject to asset forfeiture."

Documents also said US Private Vaults did not rent solely to criminal customers and many customers used its services for legitimate reasons.

"FBI stands by its ongoing investigation of US Private Vaults," Eimiller said, "a business that criminally facilitated drug trafficking and money laundering, and which allowed customers to store their criminal proceeds anonymously in safe-deposit boxes."

According to the court papers, US Private Vaults solicited criminal clientele on its website, saying the less it knew about its customers, the better. The company advertised its services to help customers "avoid 'government agencies (such as the IRS) or attorneys armed with court orders.'"
Here's an update posted on Oct 7th, 2022

One of my main assumptions was that these private boxes would have been crazy expensive and therefore priced beyond what the common man would pay. Thus infering that the only people using them would be people with something to hide. That is not the case and the prices are actually quite reasonable. Privacy Vaults are also accesible with much more flexible hours than bank vaults so if you needed 24/7 access, they would be a much better solution for not much more money.

A couple highlights that fit the narrative of this thread,
- "The scope of what the FBI did is unprecedented," Frommer said. "This was the largest armed robbery in United States history, and it was committed by the FBI."
- Rob Johnson, an attorney who works with Frommer, described the ruling as a "shocking decision" that "will set a dangerous precedent that will allow the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to bypass the Fourth Amendment.
- "The decision will give a blueprint for the government to pry open safe-deposit boxes, storage lockers, and other private spaces," he said, "and to take the contents with civil forfeiture."
 

WFO Speedracer

A lifetime ban is like a lifetime warranty !
Location
Alabama
Yeah, I'm not looking forward to declaring my paypal income for the first time ever. I tried to lay low but pegged the threshold mid January so it is what it is. It's a drop in the bucket as far as my total income goes so I can't see it shrinking my return by much.

FYI, I was digging for information on the original case that started this thread and didn't realize it was well over a year old already. Of course the case against the FBI was dismissed, (convenient, cause you know that can of worms is way too big to open) and apparently there was always a plan to return items.


Here's an update posted on Oct 7th, 2022

One of my main assumptions was that these private boxes would have been crazy expensive and therefore priced beyond what the common man would pay. Thus infering that the only people using them would be people with something to hide. That is not the case and the prices are actually quite reasonable. Privacy Vaults are also accesible with much more flexible hours than bank vaults so if you needed 24/7 access, they would be a much better solution for not much more money.

A couple highlights that fit the narrative of this thread,
- "The scope of what the FBI did is unprecedented," Frommer said. "This was the largest armed robbery in United States history, and it was committed by the FBI."
- Rob Johnson, an attorney who works with Frommer, described the ruling as a "shocking decision" that "will set a dangerous precedent that will allow the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to bypass the Fourth Amendment.
- "The decision will give a blueprint for the government to pry open safe-deposit boxes, storage lockers, and other private spaces," he said, "and to take the contents with civil forfeiture."
There has been massive pushback even by Democrats about the $600.00 threshold and about the $600.00 deposit fiasco, I would look for that to change in the near future. For one thing the IRS is not set up to handle all the additional paperwork that this will entail. By doing this Biden has taxed the middle class yet again because the upper class are not doing side hustles like this to make money, well except for Donald Turmp .



But hey all you guys building $30,000 skis then selling them for $10,000 don't have to worry , as long as you are selling at a loss you are golden, but you better have held on to every receipt for anything you ever bought for that ski though.
 
Last edited:

WFO Speedracer

A lifetime ban is like a lifetime warranty !
Location
Alabama
So this is where we are at now , how dare question the FBI you conspiracy nuts.


Mother, should I run for president?
Mother, should I trust the government?
Mother, will they put me in the firing line?
Ooh, aah, is it just a waste of time?
 
Top Bottom