- Location
- Red Bluff CA
like it says. want a glass hull in decent shape. shipped to 96035. thanks
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Hull is less then a year old, in really good condition, comes with tons of extras, carbon core model. xfr, but I believe the only difference is a slightly longer tray area.
http://www.x-h2o.com/index.php?threads/2018-rickter-xfr-carbon-core.192153/
But idk what your budget is. This hull and parts cost him 11500 new.
Id like a xfs as I have a fr2 for surf and lake already. And glass specifically so I can easily repair it 5 or 10 years down the road. All vendors do not offer a glass option anymore, at least from my inquiry. Thanks for the replies either way.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Id like a xfs as I have a fr2 for surf and lake already. And glass specifically so I can easily repair it 5 or 10 years down the road. .
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Xfr will be a slightly thicker layup, so you wont have to repair it in 5-10 years. Carbon core is primarily fiberglass. You would repair it in the same fashion as a 100% glass ski.
xfs tray is different, inside bay is different they lack a bulkhead, and they are usually 10-20 pounds lighter. I have a buddy who would prob sell me his xfr for 4 or 5 k if I wanted to go that route. I appreciate the consideration either way
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Not sure why everyone is trying to get me to buy a xfr? I've rode one. Built to the hilt. It was a badass ski for sure. Flatwater flips no problem. The guy is selling it and already bought a xfs to replace it.
If there is one thing ive learned with jet skis, or anything in life for that matter. Get what you want the first time. Might be a hassle, pain, or expensive, but its worth it in the long run.
I appreciate the replies. Thats what the forum is about. But unless someone has a xfr for under 4k, im only interested in a xfs.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Because they are better suited for flat water. Hence the fs and not fr. Ive directly spoken with rickter on facebook about them. The xfr i rode was a lt model, as far as I know, same layup as a xfs. Different top deck. Being able to get your weight even a inch more forward in the tray makes a huge difference. Carbon core is not the same as glass. When you have a failure.it doesnt fail the same. Glass is very easy to repair. Im equipped with everything to do it should the need arise. I have a fr2 evo that is a great surf/freeride ski. i want a ski that is 100 percent flat water. Strictly Flips, 540s, and Barrel rolls off idle. If im going to drop 15-30k on something, I want what I want.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Freeform Factory! If you count a hull design like that.What do you mean lack a bulkhead?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because they are better suited for flat water. Hence the fs and not fr. Ive directly spoken with rickter on facebook about them. The xfr i rode was a lt model, as far as I know, same layup as a xfs. Different top deck. Being able to get your weight even a inch more forward in the tray makes a huge difference. Carbon core is not the same as glass. When you have a failure.it doesnt fail the same. Glass is very easy to repair. Im equipped with everything to do it should the need arise. I have a fr2 evo that is a great surf/freeride ski. i want a ski that is 100 percent flat water. Strictly Flips, 540s, and Barrel rolls off idle. If im going to drop 15-30k on something, I want what I want.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk