Lol, I think I might have been misunderstood simply put IMO vendors should have to pay, but then the argument comes up when would you be considered a vendor... Simple solution pay to post on the "for sale"
That's my train of thought
Diggler for example... That's a prime example because of his popularity
And by no means am I complaining on how the site is run bottom line it costs money to run it and if your making profit because of the site dam rights you should help keep it running!
I understand your position, and the emotion that drives it. I'm not defending any seller. But, this is the internet. If you start to restrict use of the site based on whether a seller has donated 10 bux or not, the result will likely be less revenue for the site because of less "hits". The ads and what the advertisers pay are/is still based on hits (I'm guessing).
And again, it's a small community compared to most. Even if they don't donate, I appreciate the knowledgable input of anyone.
I hate to think of "an X" where I can only get parts or input from a member who has "donated". lol,,,,but not lol.
It costs nothing to register and become a member.
But you think it should cost to use the "stuff for sale" section?
c'mon dude.
