Search results

The one and only...

Werd... I could fill them with helium, as well...

All right peeps, here's the questions: The topic of nose foam/increased buoyancy is at the forefront of my mind as I prepare to start reassembling my ski that sank over a year ago. What other options besides stock nose foam would be feasible in your opinions? Also, what other floation...

I attribute it to lack of enough foam in the gunwhales and leaks in the hull by the builder and my lack of installing nose foam.

The brutally, barnacally, before:

It 's about time...

ld Yessir! It would have weighed 336 with the extra foam. Might not have sunk 48 feet deep if I had more foam, though. Do I get a deepest sub award or something?!? :wiggle: Lord knows I've gotten nothing else.

Barnacles are the bomb.....:soapbox:

t i Tell me about it. :aargh4:

lol...

Nah---that wasn't below the belt---just a little jab to the chin. How much do the new hulls weigh?!? Mine is being painted this week, send me some $$$!!!

No mention of Stoyer or Parr?!? :dunno: :flush:

Bump...Hehehe...

Times Two!!!

Touche' sir. Nicely Done...

I concur. But it was kinda' funny.

Did you know that barnacles don't grow on oily surfaces? Such as an engine compartment. My next sink-age should be much easier to clean up with all the oil on the outside of the hull from riding in the Gulf.... It's no longer a "Salt Life" here, more like a "Crude-Life" with no end in...

Now that's some good ole' fashioned humor right there.....Still chuckling.....

lmao!!!

I plead the fifth....