2012 Last year for the stand up jet skis?

SuziQ

Banned
yet still, we (2-strokes) are being targeted. It is a matter of time before language gets changed. Do you wish to wait until it is too late, or would you rather have something in place to fall back upon. Matter of being prepared.
 

ger87410

How did I get here?
Location
Fort Worth
Come on guys. A PWC is not a boat. We call some 'boats', but that doesn't mean a thing in their classification.

The PWC is classified as a "Class A" Inboard Boat (a boat less than 16 feet
in length) by the U.S. Coast Guard. They are designed to carry from one to
three persons, and to be operated by a person sitting, standing, or kneeling
ON the watercraft.

EDIT: Ya'll are also missing a very important part. It's for NEW engines. When was the last time you saw a new 2-cycle boat main engine?
 
Last edited:
What does it mean for our tiny market? Not much really. The most popular "new" jet ski on here is a bare hull, be it Rickter, Stunt, B.O.B. etc. Bare hulls have no engines so no emissions requirement. There are pretty few 2008+ superjets on here. Most of us just keep fixing up our old stuff again and again.

XScream is an engine REBUILDER, not actual engine builder. Everything they do is considered a modification to a motor grand fathered in.

Looking at my own ski there really isn't much on it left from Yamaha at all:
cases - now available in billet from SB Products.
bed plates
driveshaft
pump wear ring
pump shoe
start stop switch case and some internals

EVERYTHING else is aftermarket and would presumably still be available.

The only DOOMING possibility I see is if 2 strokes are banned from public waters. Time to seriously support the AWA. Hopefully the clever lawyers on our side can lump our 2 stroke skis in with bass boats and the like. That could give us 5,000,000,000,000 fishermen on our side.

P.S. ATS_Scott and I make our living fixing, modifying and maintaining second generation Toyota MR2's. It is a car that has not been sold in the US in FIFTEEN YEARS. Even when it was sold the production numbers were LOW - especially in the later years (like <200 1995's). Despite these horrible facts our business is BOOMING.

Aaron
 

SuziQ

Banned
What does it mean for our tiny market? Not much really. The most popular "new" jet ski on here is a bare hull, be it Rickter, Stunt, B.O.B. etc. Bare hulls have no engines so no emissions requirement. There are pretty few 2008+ superjets on here. Most of us just keep fixing up our old stuff again and again.

XScream is an engine REBUILDER, not actual engine builder. Everything they do is considered a modification to a motor grand fathered in.

Looking at my own ski there really isn't much on it left from Yamaha at all:
cases - now available in billet from SB Products.
bed plates
driveshaft
pump wear ring
pump shoe
start stop switch case and some internals

EVERYTHING else is aftermarket and would presumably still be available.

The only DOOMING possibility I see is if 2 strokes are banned from public waters. Time to seriously support the AWA. Hopefully the clever lawyers on our side can lump our 2 stroke skis in with bass boats and the like. That could give us 5,000,000,000,000 fishermen on our side.

P.S. ATS_Scott and I make our living fixing, modifying and maintaining second generation Toyota MR2's. It is a car that has not been sold in the US in FIFTEEN YEARS. Even when it was sold the production numbers were LOW - especially in the later years (like <200 1995's). Despite these horrible facts our business is BOOMING.

Aaron


Who are those clever lawyers please? What are their names?
 

ger87410

How did I get here?
Location
Fort Worth
The 2-strokers have been prime targets of the EPA for years, probably decades.

The USCG won't be able to change the classifications of the PWC to match those of a regular motorized boat because they'd also have to change the requirement. For instance, Navigation Lights.

Besides, all current skis are going to have to be grandfathered in. This will mean nothing more then no more new engines from the manufacturer. I bet there's going to be AM people out there still making engines. The easy way around those regulations, as already stated, the manufacturer just supplies the hull and another company supplies the engine.
 

SuziQ

Banned
The 2-strokers have been prime targets of the EPA for years, probably decades.

The USCG won't be able to change the classifications of the PWC to match those of a regular motorized boat because they'd also have to change the requirement. For instance, Navigation Lights.

Besides, all current skis are going to have to be grandfathered in. This will mean nothing more then no more new engines from the manufacturer. I bet there's going to be AM people out there still making engines. The easy way around those regulations, as already stated, the manufacturer just supplies the hull and another company supplies the engine.


I concur (mostly), yet I still feel it is prudent to get an entity set up to fall back upon...anything can change (current admin is proof of that).
 
Come on guys. A PWC is not a boat. We call some 'boats', but that doesn't mean a thing in their classification.

EDIT: Ya'll are also missing a very important part. It's for NEW engines. When was the last time you saw a new 2-cycle boat main engine?

when you have more influence than the Coast Guard we will start listening to you, until then PWC's are boats... ha ha

I see 2 smoker engines all the time. most smaller boats run 2 smokers...

I know of 5 boats I can think of just off the top of my head and all but one is smoker...
 
Last edited:

ger87410

How did I get here?
Location
Fort Worth
when you have more influence than the Coast Guard we will start listening to you, until then PWC's are boats... ha ha
:lmao: Likewise, I guess. :wink:
I see 2 smoker engines all the time. most smaller boats run 2 smokers...

I know of 5 boats I can think of just off the top of my head and all but one is smoker...
They were engines manufactured within the past few years (ie. 2005+ model year) and being used as primary, not backup engines, right? Only primary engines will feel the effect.

Would you happen to know the displacement of those engines you saw? Engines below a certain size are exempt.

EDIT: I don't think racing boats count...
 
:lmao: Likewise, I guess. :wink:

They were engines manufactured within the past few years (ie. 2005+ model year) and being used as primary, not backup engines, right? Only primary engines will feel the effect.

Would you happen to know the displacement of those engines you saw? Engines below a certain size are exempt.

EDIT: I don't think racing boats count...

they are all like 50-150hp and primary. Don't know anyone that has a boat w/ 2 motors..
 

SuziQ

Banned
Are you guys having a “my motor knowledge is bigger than your motor knowledge” deal again? :biggrin:

Granted, we are discussing motors, but we are also discussing necessary strategy (legal), and unfortunately the two don’t always mix well. Kinda like putting 20 to 1 synthetic and 30 to 1 “the other stuff” all in one mix maybe? That’s how this thread seems without looking at it closely.

However, Memorial Day Weekend has arrived! :usa:

A question to muse during such time (still with respect to what you should be remembering) might be whether it is good to have an additional entity set-up for "racing and freestyle competition", still falling directly underneath the protection of the boating umbrella, or would that in fact make us easier to dissect (what they are doing…divide and conquer).

Think of it like Transocean and BP, lol.
 
Last edited:

WFO Speedracer

A lifetime ban is like a lifetime warranty !
Location
Alabama
As long as two stroke oil is available I will be running two strokes, if at some point I forsee it no longer being available I will buy a lifetime supply and store it at my facility for my own personal use.
 
Top Bottom