Big boys ski?

FlightPlanDan

Don'tTrustAfartAfter50
I know......light SXR is a little lighter than a stock super jet......30lbs....sick!!
A 280lb man is gonna pretty much balance out any weight savings in the ski. The point is that he could have a good time on an sxr, maybe a super jet, but he will soon be looking for performance enhancing modifications just like the rest of us.

Redskin, get the ski you like. Make it the ski you love.
 

Shonuff

I've got the glow
Site Supporter
Location
Memphis
You'll have to dump $3500 into a SuperJet to give you the ride, speed, and stability of an SX-R.

Also, the SX-R was designed for the 2003 motosurf season which took place in - wait for it - the surf.
 
Location
Ohio
Yea and you can make a SXR launch a little I suppose.

He could get a modded widened SJ from a member maybe.
 
Last edited:

227

Its all about the surf!
Location
Oceanside, CA
Yea and you can make a SXR launch a little I suppose.

Mat Sorry man but I gotta bust your chops on this one, your not giving this guy any sound advice. Newbs come on here to get advice on what would be best for them, not necessarily what’s best for you or me. This guy (Red) is a newb who wants to Surf ride West Coast waves. He’s not looking to dethrone Malone or even compete with someone with your riding experience. For a guy his size, a Bone stock SXR with the mods I mentioned previously will work for him for several years. If he wants to get into the sport more heavily he can sell his initial investment in a few years for close to what he paid for it. BTW my main riding buddy Matt Smith rides a SXR with a FP pipe only and I regularly see him throw 10’ Barrel Rolls (Yes I said TEN FEET)
 
Location
Ohio
I believe you 227....must be hitting big waves at high MPH. Still a fat heavy turd though. Super heavy brown floating type of turd.

And its resale value will be nothing in a few years IMO. Waste.

SJ with widened gunnies or a SXR with SJ weight is not steering someone wrong in any way. No way no how.
 

Shonuff

I've got the glow
Site Supporter
Location
Memphis
I believe you 227....must be hitting big waves at high MPH. Still a fat heavy turd though. Super heavy brown floating type of turd.

And its resale value will be nothing in a few years IMO. Waste.

SJ with widened gunnies or a SXR with SJ weight is not steering someone wrong in any way. No way no how.

It's resale is on par with the SuperJet if not better - they both suffer from too often BNG.

How much is a 1996 SuperJet worth? - $2600
How much is a 2006 Superjet worth? - $3600
 
Don't forget about the Polaris Octane as an option too.

My brother's about 270 to 280 and that's what he's currently riding. He used to have a SXR, which was definitely better than the 650sx that he was riding years ago. The hull was a great size for him, but he was never really fond of the bulkyness and weight of it. The only mods he had done to the SXR was an extended ride plate, a different intake grate, and a Factory wet pipe. Last year he sold the SXR and switched to the Octane. The Octane is definitely his favourite boat of anything he's ridden. Plenty of power and also a lot more buoyancy than most other boats aside from the SXR. I think the added buoyancy is definitely the big difference in "managing" and being able to have a good time. He's ridden my square nose SJ around and some of my friends round nose SJs, but he doesn't look right on it, and they don't seem to be buoyant enough for him to really have a good time. Him on the SXR or Octane is more like the average rider on a SJ as far as I'm concerned.

I know this is really a SupeJet biased site. I'l admit I'm generally biased to the SuperJet (and Octane) myself. But I really think in the case where the rider is around 280 lbs, they are best on a wider hull with some extra buoyancy that comes with the SXR or Octane. In my opinion, and my brother's, a superjet is not the right choice in this case.
 
Last edited:

Rickster

Matakana Menace
I have never read so much BullShiat and speculation in my life... Why don't we just put him on a 3-D for stability?:Eyecrazy:

You do NOT want a lightweight hull to start riding on, as the the nose will come up way too fast due to the weight on the back....

A limited SJ with tubbies and -4 pole and straight bars (-7.5" total) would be ideal for him in the surf, and would only set him back $3-4K...

I'm 6'-2 and 275lbs and will keep up with 99% of riders on this forum on either my square or Roundie....

:twak:
 
Location
Ohio
Again....lighter weight IS NOT lightweight.

A light SXR weighs about the same as a modded SJ.

No brainer!! My nose does not come up unless I run a super short ride plate.
 

Rickster

Matakana Menace
Again....lighter weight IS NOT lightweight.

A light SXR weighs about the same as a modded SJ.

No brainer!! My nose does not come up unless I run a super short ride plate.

An SXR is too big and bulky, at least for me, with not enough bottom end to get a big guy out of the hole...

this is based on the two SXR's that I have ridden, one that was stock and the other from a local racer...

Lighter is not always better... Stock reinforced weight is fine. especially in the surf where the weight helps as a stabilizing force (or balast if you will)...

Ho heavy are you Matt? From our Daytona meetings I would say 180ish? That extra 100 pounds, and where it is distributed on the rider makes a big difference on how the ski reacts...
 
Location
Ohio
Yea and since I didn't hit 180 this Summer I really need to figure out something to do this Winter......

Ahhhgggg!!!
 
Top Bottom