- Location
- sask, canada
I calculate it at 1105.8cc, but I really don't notice the missing 1.2cc's when I'm riding mine lol
et 1107 krash
- Thread starter krash45p
- Start date
I calculate it at 1105.8cc, but I really don't notice the missing 1.2cc's when I'm riding mine lol
- Location
- Annapolis, MD
Are these motors actually at 95mm bore? Are they on the last bore?
masterblaster
X-H2
yesh,lotta stress in here over a couple cc. Its a 7 port motor with a sleeve and very effective powervalves,completely diff and much cheaper than a 11 port nik cylinder guys are stressing over.
mikeb..that the only prop you have with it?
mikeb..that the only prop you have with it?
mike b
Michael "Mayhem" Bevacqua aka MikeyChan
- Location
- California
@masterblaster Yes. Only prop I have but can always send it to skat to get repitched. Everything is like brand new. I just looked inside the pump and not a single bend or nick anywhere
masterblaster
X-H2
we would bend it,but moving from a 9 to where it needs to be would be less than ideal,i assume its a skat swirl prop as well? why did you get such a low pitch?
mike b
Michael "Mayhem" Bevacqua aka MikeyChan
- Location
- California
@masterblaster It was just the pitch i got with the pump from a peppy 800cc on race gas. Did pretty good on my motor but I understand it wasn't proper. You can always try trading in with skat. They tend to be very helpful or if you want just the pump I have someone for the impeller
- Location
- netherlands
That looks sweet!!
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk
Ducky
Back in the game!
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
Every motor manufacture does this. Yamaha has done it. Kawasaki has done it. AM Motor builders have done it. When you buy a 10mil Dasa 1000....you actually get a 10mil Dasa 992.
Potato Potado.
- Location
- Charlotte NC
Actually you get a 970...... but it doesn't really matter
Ducky
Back in the game!
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
Yea you're right. I was just using the closer displacement using 90mm pistons instead of 89mm pistons that you would initially start with.
not every motor manufacture does this......
Ducky
Back in the game!
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
Well thank the lord there are still honest people in business.
- Location
- sask, canada
No, they start at 94 and go up .5mm increments, so there are 2 more bores. Starts at 1082cc at 94 I believe. All motor manufacturers name their motors based on final bore in my experience.
Big Kahuna
Administrator
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, AL
Nope, Then the Superjet would have been a Superjet 735cc (give or take). Think it is just marketing. a 1000 sounds better than 993. A 550 sounds better than a 532. An 800 sound better than a 787? (Cannot remember the actuall CC of the SXR 800 motor)..
masterblaster
X-H2
smh,based on whos posting,its not hard to believe there are half dozen posts stressing over 2 ccs in cylinder, rather than the more important 1000cc to 1500cc ohhh cough cough i mean dollars left in his pocket building it under the other brand being compared against. lol
- Location
- Charlotte NC
Quote from masterdisaster, but about tpe.... seems he jumps on the closest swinging... well you get the point.
With the cost of a rebuilt stock stroke crank,compared to a stroker crank,that really isnt that critical.But very sim setups in the atv world being already tested are running much longer between rebuilds than strokers. Its going to be really nice to have a stock stroke motor out that makes REALLY good power with very basic inexpensive bolt ons..On lighter hulls this is very much a dual purpose surf/flat setup...There are a ton of people that want just that with out breaking the bank on billet...enter....true performance. Its been a 2 yr learning experience of what works and what REALLY works and its awesome to see it coming together and still for the guy on a budget that wants to rip with the best of em.
With the cost of a rebuilt stock stroke crank,compared to a stroker crank,that really isnt that critical.But very sim setups in the atv world being already tested are running much longer between rebuilds than strokers. Its going to be really nice to have a stock stroke motor out that makes REALLY good power with very basic inexpensive bolt ons..On lighter hulls this is very much a dual purpose surf/flat setup...There are a ton of people that want just that with out breaking the bank on billet...enter....true performance. Its been a 2 yr learning experience of what works and what REALLY works and its awesome to see it coming together and still for the guy on a budget that wants to rip with the best of em.
masterblaster
X-H2
It's great tpe is in the market also. It started the effect of budget performance motors. wonder who conceived that concept?
Et took it a step further beating their prices by a lot.
With your analogy of a old quote.. good thing et makes a Ss motor for way less also. Although no ss really impresses much with the basic bolt ons mentioned compared to todays 10 mills .Since then the price of 10 mill crank has come down exponentially.. I've ridden a few tpe Ss. They aren't doing much with out 4k of huge carbs 30 deg timing in tl ign and big front mount pipe.. live and learn I respect a builder that puts alot of dyno time into developing their port specs,motor package and keeps cost lower to the end user.ss
Et took it a step further beating their prices by a lot.
With your analogy of a old quote.. good thing et makes a Ss motor for way less also. Although no ss really impresses much with the basic bolt ons mentioned compared to todays 10 mills .Since then the price of 10 mill crank has come down exponentially.. I've ridden a few tpe Ss. They aren't doing much with out 4k of huge carbs 30 deg timing in tl ign and big front mount pipe.. live and learn I respect a builder that puts alot of dyno time into developing their port specs,motor package and keeps cost lower to the end user.ss
Last edited: