- Location
- Harvey's Lake PA
I’m not worried about crank life. As long as I get a summer out of it I’m happy. More worried about having too much power .
I run fs49 on my 1107 soo does @Christian_83 what a you looking for ???Just curious anyone run this motor with fs49s? Torn between the 967 and 1107. Never flipped a ski. Already have the 49s. Thanks
You Can always goe stock elec at first, my guess is it Will not be long before you goe full TLI’m not worried about crank life. As long as I get a summer out of it I’m happy. More worried about having too much power .
Not gonna have that problem with a ET motorMore worried about having too much power .
I’m not worried about crank life. As long as I get a summer out of it I’m happy. More worried about having too much power .
That's assuming a stock stroke crank needs to be rebuilt at the same intervals as a 10mm which isn't true. Even Art himself said the 10mm will need to be rebuilt much more often (common for stroked engines). So really, you are talking $550 every year, plus time to teardown, shipping costs, etc. Versus rebuilding the 967 every 2-3 years (depending on hours). For me that additional downtime and cost wasn't worth the investment. However, I also don' think I'm ready for 1107 power. When I get used the 967 in a year or two, maybe my opinion will change lol.1100 is better than the 967. The 1100 won’t make you feel like you need more, but the 967 will for FW. I don’t think the crank life or rebuild cost is much different anyway. $550 to have a 10mm crank rebuilt vs a $230 sbt crank. But of course the upfront cost is more, but worth it in the long run.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FS 49 are great carbs, easy to setup. I ran These on DASA 850 SS, TPE 900CO comp and now ET1107. Never had any issue.Just curious anyone run this motor with fs49s? Torn between the 967 and 1107. Never flipped a ski. Already have the 49s. Thanks
FS 49 are great carbs, easy to setup. I ran These on DASA 850 SS, TPE 900CO comp and now ET1107. Never had any issue.
Im surprised you guys running that low pitch impeller with oem 155 pump on a ET967.
What kind of riding are you doing?
That's assuming a stock stroke crank needs to be rebuilt at the same intervals as a 10mm which isn't true. Even Art himself said the 10mm will need to be rebuilt much more often (common for stroked engines). So really, you are talking $550 every year, plus time to teardown, shipping costs, etc. Versus rebuilding the 967 every 2-3 years (depending on hours). For me that additional downtime and cost wasn't worth the investment. However, I also don' think I'm ready for 1107 power. When I get used the 967 in a year or two, maybe my opinion will change lol.
Anyone ever asked art what he gets for a new crank? He builds his own these days. I also wonder if he does rebuilds? Gotta be cheaper then a $900 normal crank rebuild right?
Im running a ET1107 with a longblade 13/18 in Setback mag, spaced all the way back to veins.What pitch are you running on a 967?
I ride flat water. Mine hooks decent now that it’s all tuned in
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes the Oem(967 Et) stroke is way more reliable than a +10 stroker .... I got the 967 and some friend have the +10 AdA or whatever !! rebuilding it every year or you are seating on a bomb !!! CheersThat's assuming a stock stroke crank needs to be rebuilt at the same intervals as a 10mm which isn't true. Even Art himself said the 10mm will need to be rebuilt much more often (common for stroked engines). So really, you are talking $550 every year, plus time to teardown, shipping costs, etc. Versus rebuilding the 967 every 2-3 years (depending on hours). For me that additional downtime and cost wasn't worth the investment. However, I also don' think I'm ready for 1107 power. When I get used the 967 in a year or two, maybe my opinion will change lol.
I was more of less trying to find out if the 967 runs well with the fs49. I read some forums that mentioned they were too much. I’ll be going with the 1107 with zeel charging. I don’t want a total loss. I’d like to run no scupper but not sure if dual 500s are a good alternative.I run fs49 on my 1107 soo does @Christian_83 what a you looking for ???
FS49's are fine with a 967.I was more of less trying to find out if the 967 runs well with the fs49. I read some forums that mentioned they were too much. I’ll be going with the 1107 with zeel charging. I don’t want a total loss. I’d like to run no scupper but not sure if dual 500s are a good alternative.
If it’s the same cutback and otherwise the same I’d say you will be fine. You can pretty easily bend a prop one degree if you want also.About to order another one of these motors in the next week. Running just an msd right now with sbn46 and a 148 mag. Last ski I built I ran a 11/17 5mm cut back. Anyone know if I could get away with a 10/16 ??
same discussion happening in the 1107 thread btw. https://www.x-h2o.com/threads/et1107cc-tuning-thread.200564/page-2Who are you all having do your 967 cylinder porting?