Everyone hear damn well knows if you started a negative freak thread the wolves would pounce.
If you started a negative Freak feedback thread (or any negative feedback thread) that accurately recounts your negative buying/product experience, then the only people allowed to post in that thread are the involved parties. So no, no pouncing.
When were you supposed to get it?
The date has moved around quite a bit. It was by mutual agreement, I wasn't lied to about it, and I am not currently chomping at the bit to get it nor is my continued riding hinging upon it.
A lot of my comments made in this thread apply here, too - I'll get more specific at a later time. Promise
Correct. That fact is well known and not really hidden by anyone, is it?
It was a big part of why I didn't buy another Freak.
It's not even customer loyatly, some guys just like to say they have the best stuff and wont consider cheaper alternatives because its obviously not as good. Its not just hulls, it goes for most of this stuff this industry. I know guys that wont touch blackjack carbs, because there "not as good as Novi's and full specs" only looking at the cost of the carbs
You're right. That was part of why the "high dollar hull crowd" was (or still is) bitching at Ski Clinic all the time.
So the more you pay the better it is?
More often than not, you do get what you pay for. But, a few people take this to the extreme, unfortunately.
And that rule definitely doesn't apply to a/m hulls. IMHO