- Location
- the jetski grave yard
Neither I am just looking to see what people think. Which is obviously pretty negative for some reason even though no one has real evidence for that.Are you just trolling or are you new at this?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I would agree with the statement “very well known to break” back in 2014 but now with the new hull, cases have vastly diminished. If they were very well known to break I don’t think they would be the best selling pwcAlso keep in mind the Spark hulls are very well known to break on any impacts and can’t be repaired, only replaced.
Neither I am just looking to see what people think. Which is obviously pretty negative for some reason even though no one has real evidence for that.
Seadoo spark. Theyre the cheapest new ski, readily available, have warranty, have financing, and have reputation. You can walk into 1000 dealers and buy one.I would agree with the statement “very well known to break” back in 2014 but now with the new hull, cases have vastly diminished. If they were very well known to break I don’t think they would be the best selling pwc
I would agree with the statement “very well known to break” back in 2014 but now with the new hull, cases have vastly diminished. If they were very well known to break I don’t think they would be the best selling pwc
Best selling has nothing to do with quality. They still break on impact and can’t be repaired. Doesn’t matter how many they sell.
The average person will ride a spark for years with no issues, stand ups are not ridden by your average couch shoppers.
Also McDonalds sells more hamburgers than anybody in the world but are they the best burgers you have ever had? You best selling logic don’t prove the spark is the best ski.
Thanks for the great feedback! I am doing this research to decide if it is a viable business endeavor.
yes, the idea was to have faster/easier production, cheaper production cost down the road and potentially a good alternative to a carbon hull (weight wise) if it was strong enoughIt's not, you could make more money doing a lot of other things, hard to make it in this niche market.
Your talking big money to get started with very little return.
Idk why you want to use plastic, faster manufacturing? It would make more sense to make the hull out of SMC, proven and can be stamped out, still not as strong a fiberglass/carbon though.
There would have to be all kinds of ribs molded in to give it rigidity. By doing so, you would increase weight drastically. I would imagine ribs would have to be at least 3/8" wide and honeycombing the inside of the hull and inside of the tray areas as well.I absolutely appreciate the more recent feedback! Backed up with actual reason other than opinions.
yes, the idea was to have faster/easier production, cheaper production cost down the road and potentially a good alternative to a carbon hull (weight wise) if it was strong enough
This is an interesting idea for sure!Here is a better idea. Stamped aluminum hulls.. Light, strong, easy to repair. If you can gelcoat over the aluminum no one would know the difference.
Will have to look into the molding in ribs idea (sounds like a good idea) but I have been told honeycombing with drastically enhance durability. Thanks for the input!There would have to be all kinds of ribs molded in to give it rigidity. By doing so, you would increase weight drastically. I would imagine ribs would have to be at least 3/8" wide and honeycombing the inside of the hull and inside of the tray areas as well.