Freestyle RCW Brawler Build for 2016, ET1107 PICS ENGINE BUILT!!

joecef

joecef

Live fast, Die Fat
Location
Canada, EH
61x is earlier 701 and 650 62t was later to present. I've also heard that for freestyle "stock" you'd want to run 61x because the flywheel is smaller and lighter. Not to sure about that. I've only ran 62t and total loss
 
Raddog

Raddog

Location
Brooklin Ont
I have extensively tested the 61X and 62T on our engine simulation machine. If a 61X and 62T CDI are operated on the same stator, the outputs (high voltage) at any given rpm is about the same. The same cannot be said if the CDIs are used with thier respective stators. The 62T has an increased output up to around 2500, then about the same as the 61X up to the rev limit, which varies slightly. I have unpotted a few of these, and the general circuit trace layout appears to be about the same, but the component values and tolerances seem to vary regardless of generation.

I believe the increased output of the 62T is mostly due to the beefed up charge coil and stronger magnets, and not any difference in CDI design.

You can convert any motor to either system, as long as matching flywheels are used, as the 61X is smaller in diameter.

It is interesting to note (for good starting performance) that the 62T setup generates a nice health spark with a quick low torque hand spin of the flywheel (on the stator machine), in less than one revolution, and the 61X always requires a much more forceful spin to even get the first spark, which is visable less powerful on the calibrated spark gap (6mm), which usually occures in at least one revolution, sometimes more.


I just thought I'd check the web and found this in no time
Ray
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom