Funny, wasn't looking @ dates....seemed heavy. -weight conscious in Ohio
It may be a rumor but I heard someone had a ski in the 190s area
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
265 RTR with 2.5 gallon Blitz jug full, carbon freak surf layup. Rides so good in surf, makes my rn feel like an SXR that turns like a slug...
Yah, calling bull on 190 RTR (unless there is some really innovative weighing and record keeping going on)
EDIT: Additional info: A 56lbs carbon hull came to a 242 RTR weight without gas and with Ballistic battery. That's with an 8lbs hood and a 6.5lbs carbon pole.
So, to get that down into 190 RTR range, you're looking at taking 52 lbs off that RTR weight. I am not so sure where you're going to save weight in the driveline.
Okay, so take 52lbs off that 71lbs hull/hood/pole combo. RIGHT>
Someone trying to sell a hull that came from a questionable 'builder' and was never very popular, and is claiming a ridiculously low RTR weight in the for sale thread? Well, I never.
Yup, we've brought a few ski's up here there were 210 lbs RTR in there for sale thread, but when I put them on my scale they were 230 lbs no gas.Someone trying to sell a hull that came from a questionable 'builder' and was never very popular, and is claiming a ridiculously low RTR weight in the for sale thread? Well, I never.
Yup, we've brought a few ski's up here there were 210 lbs RTR in there for sale thread, but when I put them on my scale they were 230 lbs no gas.
Mine is reinforced for surf and has a heavy pole, heavy solas pump, stock hood. Ect. With a full tank it's 400 rtr.
But it does alright for what it is.
It's not an ideal flat water ski.