650/X-2 should i put a 750 engine????

i just bought a js sx 650 1992 with broken engine.i wonder if the 750 motor is easy to work with the factory side exhaust the factory electrics?? i'm planning to use 44 mikuni. if anyone has done it i would like some info
Thanks for your time!!!!!!!!:question:
 

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
The 750 motor will be more work and more money. If you are not afraid, then yes, you should put a 750 motor in it.

There is tons of stuff already written on the forum about what you need to do. Start with the X2 mods stick in this same forum and go from there.

The motor is the easy part, single or dual carbs will fit just fine. Your problems will be the pipe and water box. That information should be easy to find.
 
Yes..750 is the same to put in as a 650..just different electronics..put the 750 ebox on the gas tank until you can get a rad dudes surf brace with ebox mount..use the exhaust manifold off your 650 and get yourself a 650 exhaust..everything will work the same.
 

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
Don't use the factory side exhaust. It's restrictive. Don't use the stock waterbox or a 650 AM pipe. If you want to half ass your 750 with 650 parts, just stick with a 650. You can get a B1 exhuast outlet to replace the stock outlet, it's 1/4" bigger. I don't know which waterbox you can use to replace the stocker. I have been using a stock RN SJ box. Much more flow, but it creates some exhaust routing issues and you can't use the stock outlet location. You need to go out the right if using the SJ box.
 
hell to the yea you should, couple of by buddys did it to their x2's, i love it. in the process of building an x2 with a 750 in it now. AND yes i know you have a 650 sx.....

but whats the old phrase...."There is NO replacement, for DISPLACEMENT"
 
Last edited:

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
hell to the yea you should, couple of by buddys did it to their x2's, i love it. in the process of building an x2 with a 750 in it now. AND yes i know you have a 650 sx.....

but whats the old phrase...."There is NO replacement, for DISPLACEMENT"

Actually the replacement is positive pressure, but I don't think anyone is going to be putting a supercharger on a 2-stroke ski. :haha:
 

iangdesign

Cats, lots of cats!
Location
United States
I think someone was putting turbos/supers on 2 strokes in the 80s. Saw one on a stand last year in the vintage booth at WFs.

People have been putting 750s in X2 and using 650 exhaust for a while now. How is a 650sx different?
 

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
I think someone was putting turbos/supers on 2 strokes in the 80s. Saw one on a stand last year in the vintage booth at WFs.

People have been putting 750s in X2 and using 650 exhaust for a while now. How is a 650sx different?

It's not different. Just because it bolts up, doesn't mean it's right. Someone posted a 550 ski with a 750 motor and a 550 pump on craigslist not too long ago. It was unanomous that noone believed the 550 pump could handle the 750 power.

Yes, the 650 pipe fits. yes people use it. I am personally a non-believer. Now I had a westcoast 650 pipe on my X2 once. It made good power. I liked it because it fit into the hull really easy and lined right up with the stock exhaust. However, I don't believe for a minute that I was truely pulling the power out of that motor. Noone is sticking a Westcoast 650 pipe on the SXR. I wonder why?

The only thing about the 650sx that's different than the X2, is that the 650 sx has a lot more space in the engine compartment, tons more if you remove the fire extinguisher, so there's no excuse for not finding a better pipe.
 
Last edited:

Wilke

X2 stole my life
Location
Indialantic, FL
^yup, people use the 650 pipes because of ease of use (fit) and the lower cost, myself included, not because its the best choice for the motor. Both my SX and X2 have 750 big pins running a westcoast pipe (well a jetco and a westcoast), and they run just fine, but I am well aware that they are costing me power over better pipe options.

so there's no excuse for not finding a better pipe.
Justifing the price. I just can't seem to get myself to spend 1/3 or more of the total cost I have in the entire ski for a pipe setup when I am just rec riding, you can find running skis for what some of the pipes cost. My want for more power has not gotten to the point where I feel $400-$600 is money well spent for the gains.
 

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
^yup, people use the 650 pipes because of ease of use (fit) and the lower cost, myself included, not because its the best choice for the motor. Both my SX and X2 have 750 big pins running a westcoast pipe (well a jetco and a westcoast), and they run just fine, but I am well aware that they are costing me power over better pipe options.


Justifing the price. I just can't seem to get myself to spend 1/3 or more of the total cost I have in the entire ski for a pipe setup when I am just rec riding, you can find running skis for what some of the pipes cost. My want for more power has not gotten to the point where I feel $400-$600 is money well spent for the gains.

Valid point. I was thinking more from a tuning stand point. Lots of people who obviously have money to throw around still use the 650 pipes. I was thinking more about those types. I'm in your boat. I only have a 750 FPP because I got it for cheap. I have a lot of tuning problems because my screws are damaged. I've tried to pay people to repair them, which has improved the situation, but it's still sucking. I wish FPP had just used helicoils. Half assed engineering at it's finest. If I had $800 to throw around on a new pipe, my SJ would have a B-pipe and my X2 would still be apart.

I had a 750 limited chamber, went to the SJ chamber for easier fit. I was going to try going back to the 750 limited chamber again because it's tuned for the motor, but I can't find it. Must have sold it and forgot, cuz it's a huge item to lose.
 
Last edited:
Location
dfw
A local rider had a 650SX with a stock SXI engine/coffmans 650 pipe that would flat outrun most Superjets in Dallas.
 
what i don't understand, is how something like a westcoast 650 pipe on a 701 wouldn't work out pretty well.
I recently asked this on PWCtoday and pretty much got a "not worth it" and i know this isn't about exactly that but....when you see 701's in stock super jets with stock exhaust....i cant see how that would be better then a 650 west coast pipe...and im referring to this 701 pipe
IMAG0171.jpg
 
Location
dfw
what i don't understand, is how something like a westcoast 650 pipe on a 701 wouldn't work out pretty well.
I recently asked this on PWCtoday and pretty much got a "not worth it" and i know this isn't about exactly that but....when you see 701's in stock super jets with stock exhaust....i cant see how that would be better then a 650 west coast pipe...and im referring to this 701 pipe
IMAG0171.jpg

If you are talking about Yamahas, Westcoast only made one for a 701 waveblaster. BTW Yamaha 650 pipes work very well on 701s. The discussion was about Kawasaki 650 peripherals on a 750 engine. They can work well but usually not for most people. If total horsepower was the most important, nothing but a dry pipe would be useable.
 

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
Listen, if people want to do 750 conversion, they should go for it. The 750 is hands down more powerful than the 650 motor. However, the pipe is the most important component of 2-stroke performance. The B-pipe is tuneable and that's why it's so power. It allows every bit of horse power to be cranked out of the motor.

650 motors are cheaper than 750 motors. The skis often come with running 650 motors, so the conversion is a much larger expense. However, the OP has a broken motor, and will need a new one. In this case, it makes sense to buy a 750 motor. however, say everything is good except it needs bore and piston, good crank and etc, I think the money woul dbe better spent on a bore and light port work of the 650 than sticking in a porrly done job with a 750 that costs more.

The 650 motor wont put out as much power as the 750 motor with the same pipe.

My personal opinion is that if you can put a 750 motor in a hull for about the same price as a 650, the obvious answer is to go with the 750 motor. However, I don't think it's worth upgrading to a 750 motor if you plan to just shove it in there and call it a day. it will never run to it's potential. Keep it simple, stock e-box and etc, and leave the 650 in there. This is especially true of the X2 with the small engine compartment.

I do think that a 750 is the best way to go in the sx, if you need a motor, can find one at the right price, and plan to someday do a good job tuning it. I just feel it's better if you are on a budget to tune the 650 motor and enjoy it than have a 750 motor that is poorly tuned with 650 parts but maybe performs a tad better for more money and more hassle.

Just my experience.
 
Last edited:

Vumad

Super Hero, with a cape!
Location
St. Pete, FL
what i don't understand, is how something like a westcoast 650 pipe on a 701 wouldn't work out pretty well.
I recently asked this on PWCtoday and pretty much got a "not worth it" and i know this isn't about exactly that but....when you see 701's in stock super jets with stock exhaust....i cant see how that would be better then a 650 west coast pipe...and im referring to this 701 pipe
IMAG0171.jpg

It has to do with the properties of combustion. I'm not well enough versed to go into specific details but I can give you some info you can use to look up on google if you like. The reasons have to do with a many number of factors such as port timing, exhuast temp, acoustics, air velosity, back pressure.

Trying to keep this simple...

2-strokes don't work like 4 strokes. There are no valves to keep the air and fuel in the ocmbustion chamber. Crank case pressure pulls fuel in and pushes out spent fuel. The fuel would flow right out with the exhaust gases, but the back pressure from the exhuast system keeps this from happening. More important than air pressure is the sound wave of the explosion. The sound travels down the pipe, gets to the end and is reflected back to the cylinder. The air gets back at just the right time to allow all of the spent gas to escape but keep the good gas/air in the cylinder. Too much speed and the gases get stuck inside, causing a build up of heat, more fuel is added through the carb, fuel is waster and performance decreases (believe it or not, the less fuel you use, the more power you get, a lot of fuel is wasted in cooling the cylinders, lean is faster but too hot). Too little sound speed and the clean fuel escapes, leading to a waste of fuel and a loss of power.

This is why the B-pipe is so popular. By allowing adjustment of the water injection, the heat in the pipe can be changed. Sound is faster hotter and slower colder. Adding or removing water changes heat, which changes speed, which changes pressure, which changers power. This also explains why other pipes perform better at different RPM. They have the right design for a specific RPM, but the B-pipe can be adjuested for different sound velocity and thus different pressure and porformance at different RPM. This is also the explination for Electronic Water injection on the B-pipe, it allows a broader range of performance from the pipe by varying the speeds of the air as RPM changes.

Yes, you can put a used kawi 650 westcoast pipe on a yamaha 701 motor. Yes, it will probably work better than stock. however, the pipe specs do not match the port timing and various other factors of the engine performace. You will have a $200 pipe on a motor that performs like it has a $200 pipe on it. And, you will have a lot of hassles making it fit. But for $600-800 you can have a motor that performs to it's potential.

All of these same factors apply to the discussion about the kawi 750 with a kawi 650 pipe. Yes it fits. Yes you can do it. Yes it's easier. Yes most people do it. Yes it will out perform a stock pipe. But no, it will not ever reach it's true potential. Think of it like this. You can replace the stock Kawi 38mm keihen carb with a 44mm mikuni carb, but if you don't take the time to properly tune your new carb, you will only get mildly better performace at the cost of the carb and the wasting of a lot of fuel. However, if you spent the extra money on a jet kit and tuned your motor, you get more power and waste less fuel, giving you a much higher yield for not much more investment.

So back to the original discussion, if the goal is to be cheap and slap in a 750 motor with a cheap pipe and leave your e-box sitting where ever it fits, then you're just as well spending less money on a 650 or the same money doing a good job on a 650. But, the best thing to do is drop in a 750, and instead of spending $200-300 on the wrong pipe, wait and spend $300-600 on the right pipe. It's worth waiting and saving the extra money.

If the OP needs to run the stock 650 pipe for a bit to save for the right pipe, well, that makes ok sense. But to remove a stock superjet pipe to put a $250 Kawi pipe, so it works a little better, well, that doesn't make sense, because you just wasted half of the total cost of buying the right thing on the wrong thing. And then you always get to try to explain to people with funny looks and better performing skis about how you over came the challenge of rigging together a poorly tuned ski. I know showing off my X2 always gave my a warm fuzzy feeling of failure.
 
Top Bottom