- Location
- Maryland
Any structural flaws or just cosmetic?
I meant how much was the hull and what model hurricane
Any structural flaws or just cosmetic?
$4500. It was part of his November special for white/black gel only. C2 model.
Don't get me wrong, I like my hull a lot and it does everything it's supposed to do. There are just cosmetic flaws where it looks like the finish and bodywork were rushed. The worst is in this picture and it was hiding under the graphics. I was pretty bummed when I pulled off the sticker. I am more upset about not getting any replys or callbacks because I am trying to buy new graphics.@dose do you have any pictures of your issues? What's wrong with the hull exactly?
Don't get me wrong, I like my hull a lot and it does everything it's supposed to do. There are just cosmetic flaws where it looks like the finish and bodywork were rushed. The worst is in this picture and it was hiding under the graphics. I was pretty bummed when I pulled off the sticker. I am more upset about not getting any replys or callbacks because I am trying to buy new graphics.
It's just poor business.
I'm not necessarily directing this at this thread or any particular hull but I'm not sure what people expect when they buy a hull. You give me a half million dollar boat and I'll pick it apart in a hour. That's just the nature of how things are manufactured in the marine industry. I'm not saying it's right or wrong and your certainly entitled to your opinion of what's acceptable for what you paid for. I say it with boats and I'll say it with jetskis, no one could afford a jetski that is truly flawless. A 100% flawless jetski isn't going to happen without a hefty price increase. Businesses need to make money to survive and it's not going to happen building skis that are show quality for cheap. Don't get me wrong there are hacks out there and a ton of bad customer service but as long as it's not a structural problem everyone needs to keep in perspective what it would take to build a flawless ski.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not to mention it being damn near flawless compared to most am hulls...That's more than I paid for my full carbon, wrapped and turfed WDK RIP!
So is the fiberglass that's literally not attached inside my engine compartment not a defect? The gelcoat that had spider cracks fresh out of the mold? Air voids in my ride plate, all of the blistering on my bottom deck, and even small details like unfinished corners in the back where the two halves came together and it was left as bare fiberglass.
I understand it's hand made, but when I compared it to other skis at the lake from a competitor, they were really really nice. And have NONE of the issues I had, how is it that @Quinc bob gen 3 which was carbon lay up from 4 years ago basically sounds like my hull that was made 5 months ago? Poorly laid, not enough resin, and I know for a fact this thing will take on tons of water unless I fix all of the holes that it has.
As a former business owner, if you can't make a profitable product then get out of the business. Redesign the tooling, figure out better methods. INNOVATE! Be the on the leading edge. Not on the back burner.
And I really wouldn't care but he looked me square in the face and said he had no problem with my hull and the defects it had and that he FIXED his molds after he made these.
Why didn't he fix the molds after he popped the first bottom deck out? He let at least 5 skis go out with known defects. Is that good business practice? I don't think so. And several others in the industry agree with me.
Like I said not directing this at you really, haven't seen your hull I person. Do you mind if I ask what kind of business you owned?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This went from a BOB flame fest to a WDK circle jerk real quick.