wsuwrhr
Purveyor of the Biggest Brapp
- Location
- Alta Loma, working in Upland
Crappy un-edited sideways thanksgiving picture
Don't think I don't agree. I simply don't see any of the motor builders doing this. I was trying to curve the discussion to talk about something that might be possible to be done with assembled skis, to compare set ups at a freeride, since that to me would be a plausable scenario that could happen.
In the end, the riders end up being happier they didn't have to spend thousands to figure out the best combo of parts for their big dollar motors.
Hey, in the pic of that dyno, the two stacked S-type load cells on the side, are they what measure the actual output?
Damn, I didn't realize that all I needed to do was ask for the pictures.
Shait son, I'm impressed.
So how about an 800cc or 900cc shootout. I need a new motor.
You know once you go Dasa there's no going back!
My new Dasa 900 is unreal, can't wait for my new motor
Damn, I didn't realize that all I needed to do was ask for the pictures.
Shait son, I'm impressed.
So how about an 800cc or 900cc shootout. I need a new motor.
Whaat?? new motor already! you haven't even broken in your 900 yet!
Let think about it
a triple cylinder runabout motor from a race boat makes about 260 hp is what we were told.
Thats with one pipe per cylinder and a much greater space between the cylinders adding to a huge advantage in the transfer port shape and volume.
As well as a much larger and better directed reed system, with side draft carbs
same msd ignitions and 48 novis or full rectums and they were able to rev out being a race engine.
And now we are saying a twin cylinder 701 based engine with only 180mm spacing between the cylinders and a bigger bore so hugely comprimised transfers and a single pipe system is making 200hp plus.
Sorry I dont believe it. Show us some dyno figures
Good think we don't race or ride dynos.
SM
bang on, and these engines also have a cvt so they dont have to pull from low rpm, so they can be built for a higher and peakeir out put. where a jetski has to pull from low down.If you look at the snowmobile engines of equal displacement they're getting the 200 plus hp out of their engines but @ 8200 rpm to 9000 rpm, and thats using twin pipe setups. So how are watercraft getting that number at 1000 rpm lower and on a single pipe? I've done some dyno testing and you can definately fudge the numbers but it doesn't do any good if your trying to make improvement. For a good engine its all about torque and responce, and that responce comes from a good package ie: pump, ignition, engine rev charactoristics. If your screaming for hp numbers than most likely you don't really know enough about the subject to understand what makes a good setup. I'll take a good setup over supposed peak power any day. Oh yea, its gotta be tuned right to even make it worth the effort, and if you think "just give me the jetting specs" is what tunning is, you need to pay some one to do it.
Good thing too, I can tell you the seat gets really hot.
While I admire your cad work I have to say if you think torque figures dont mean much then your very very wrong.So if I open the door and take a picture of DASA's own dyno(certainly not a rented one) with a motor coupled up to it would this thread go apesh it?
Who else could post their own similar picture?
I have said before, Dynos are good for nothing but tuning a combination of components in a closely monitored situation.
Noting changes and in what direction are those changes. Published Torque numbers aren't worth the pushed keys it would take to post them.
Brian