Hi guys,
Regarding the controversy of Lee Stone and Taiji Yamamoto being tethered to their skis, as the inventor of it, I feel obligated to set the record straight regarding misunderstanding and misinformation about the tether.
Firstly,
I understand both sides of the argument, the people who are supporting it as progression of the sport and the ones who call it cheating or an "easy way" of doing the trick. I will try not to take sides in the argument, just to clarify a few things.
1. These pilots did not break any rules, therefore by definition they did not cheat.
2. I am not exactly sure why people are up in arms over using tether NOW, because I have performed this originally
4 years ago, and even Lee Stone himself did this in Havasu
night competition 3 years ago (you can find video on YouTube). Everyone in the sport knew how we did it, the rules were not changed, so it is no wonder himself or anyone since then would bring it back in a trick 3 years later.
3. As for tether making the trick easier to perform -- because so few of us have done it, you'll have to trust us on this one -- without the tether (and current way of operating a ski) it is physically
impossible to release both hands from the steering for anything longer than a
split second. Most importantly tether allows you to move your body away from the ski while doing the trick, so it looks great in photos. So, to answer this point -- yes, it would be possible to do the trick without tether, but it would be very, very brief, and not nearly as extended, ie.
significantly less impressive. It is exactly for that reason that when I invented the tether, I had decided not to do the quick release of hands in mid-air, but rather a full 360, gymnastics-like, rotation and landing, thus defining it as a new trick called "The Paralyzer" as opposed to "no-hand back flip" or "scarecrow backflip". Here are two clips showing the difference (fast forward to 2m45sec and 10m12sec):
4. The safety part. This is a big one. When I invented The Paralyzer I was fully aware I was creating the most dangerous trick, because tethering yourself to a ski which can quickly sink is
not helping you make trick safer, but rather the opposite. I have twice been in a situation where I was under water and could not release myself. The first time I was sure I was about to meet my maker, as the ski was about to sink and take me down. And in the video below you will see when in practice the tether broke and I basically folded in half upon landing, hitting my back on the nozzle. It took me 6 months to recover. Having said all that, my hope was always that
only professional freestylers would do it, so therefore I would fully support banning tether for amateurs. The same applies to my
blindfold backflip someone posted above, it is just too dangerous for amateurs. As for pros, I don't think any of it should be banned, because motocross freestyle is just as dangerous, and no one would consider lowering the size of ramps now that they helped the sport become popular.
5. The argument that tethering is not "pure" freestyle. I understand it seems like a step away from the norm, but so were the footwells and super flip bars. Without them today we would not be able to perform many of the tricks, and it is a progression of the sport, just like motocross freestyle. I can't speak for other pilots, but I can only assume they feel the same way as I do, which is that we are with you on this, and we'd much rather
not have to use any additional hardware, but there is no other way to push the limits. At the end of the day, a pilot chooses which tricks he'll perform, while the judges reward him or not. No one is forced to use footwells, super flip bars or tether, and it is not guaranteed using any of them results in a win.