Seriously, you didn’t just post that???
Lenzi Ski Pics
- Thread starter Matt_E
- Start date
Seriously, you didn’t just post that???
snowxr
V watch your daughters V
- Location
- Waterford, MI
Well let me check....YES, I did just post that! ( what am I, Master of the Obvious?)
snowxr
V watch your daughters V
- Location
- Waterford, MI
I'd say it's intended for flatwater.
dbrutherford
Parts Whore
- Location
- Fairmont, WV
IceMan
Building a ski in Progress
- Location
- United Arab Emirates
The performance is very impressive!
This is just the prototype!
This is just the prototype!
Last edited:
- Location
- Virginia Beach, VA
I kind of feel the same way, but I bet it's a blast. The vid of it going out of a backie straight into a sub is pretty knarly
Polish jet pilot
4aces4aces4aces4aces4aces
- Location
- Warsaw, Poland
Fs-1 looks way better and quality built ..compare pics... I say FS-1...and their commercial is killer too 
Big Kahuna
Administrator
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, AL
Big Kahuna
Administrator
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, AL
who knows.
Personally, I believe the pro's should be able to ride what they want.
Am. Should be OEM Hulls only.
Personally, I believe the pro's should be able to ride what they want.
Am. Should be OEM Hulls only.
snowxr
V watch your daughters V
- Location
- Waterford, MI
The rules DID change for 2009. The hulls are allowed to be within 6.5" in length and 2" in width compared to the homologated ski they resemble.
Big Kahuna
Administrator
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, AL
but what ski are they suppose to resemble!!!!!!!!!
snowxr
V watch your daughters V
- Location
- Waterford, MI
Lenzi's is SXR based. My take on the rulebook is that they are to loosly resemble a production homologated ski, like a SJ, SXR, Octane. If that's the case you have a stock SJ at 7'4". That would mean your shortest SJ based freestyle legal ski would be 6'9.5" The Q8 would likely have to go by the Octane measurements. Now who knows what they will say the FS1 is based on. If they say it's a 550 then the length might pass, but the width won't. I think there will be another fiasco at WF or sooner, when guys try to compete on new hulls like a team bill and get DQ'd before they even hit the water.
The new rules also make the competitors submit their ski to a pre-comp inspection corral for scrutineering by officials AND competitors. Protests can be filed during that period.
The new rules also make the competitors submit their ski to a pre-comp inspection corral for scrutineering by officials AND competitors. Protests can be filed during that period.
Big Kahuna
Administrator
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, AL
one day they may pull their heads out of their asses.
madscientist
chilling with these guys.
- Location
- good old p'cola
:ugh2:
:grumble:this is a great statement since the OEM'S are not sponsoring or doing anything to promote the sport. sponsored riders should be able to ride what ever company's ski they have been given the opportunity to rock for that season.
:swordfight:
:grumble:this is a great statement since the OEM'S are not sponsoring or doing anything to promote the sport. sponsored riders should be able to ride what ever company's ski they have been given the opportunity to rock for that season.
:swordfight:
Big Kahuna
Administrator
- Location
- Tuscaloosa, AL
Within reason. I do not think it fair for Joe Backflipper who is an amature to show up with an FS1 with a 1000cc Team Ripyourarmsout Motor and compete against 10 other competitors on OEM hulls with nothing larger than a 85mm Yamaha motor.
Pro Class. If you could take a showbox and drop a 1200cc WDK with a drypipe (we know that may never happen) and compete on it. I say let them.
- Location
- Melbourne, FL
The rule change fixes the new hull issues, but whatever ski yours is claimed to resemble is cases that you must run to be legal. If your ski is claimed to be an SXR, then you better have a kawi based motor in there....