the negative feedback forum - what to do with it?

[WaveDemon]

one on one, moderated is the only way

like this!

 

[steve-uk]

like this!

lol... thats just how i saw it

 

[GIL]

charlie is an asshole.

Really???ancake:

 

[sflsurfrider]

LMAO!!! :smashfreakB:

If I insult a known friend is it still a bannable (sp) offense. I like to bash Steve from time to time. :dunce:

lets see....

steves a little bitch........

 

[The Penguin]

lets see....

steves a little bitch........

why would you get banned for saying something that is the truth?

:439:

 

[sflsurfrider]

why would you get banned for saying something that is the truth?

:439:

because i always get banned for saying things that are the truth:booty:

 

[The Penguin]

oh, I guess you're right. I've drawn the short straw - and now I must ban you.

:biggrin:

 

[Rickster]

I guess some of you dont understand what BK and SJ are trying to say..

It will have to moderated only to the point of both parties will only be approved to post in a negative thread.
I feel the only way someone else can post in it is someone of the main two parties post someones name as in the Nick/BombThread/Kennay thread.
Kennay only chimed in to defend himself after his name was called out.

I hope im right.

QuickMick,

I understand what you are saying, but Kennay posting in a new thread with a link to the BombThreat thread would have the same effect as jumping into the BombThreat thread.

BombThreat vs Nick and Kennay vs Nick are two separate transactions and should be treated as such. Someone mentioned e-bay transactions before, and that is a perfect analogy.

BK,

Go read my post from the other thread.........

You know what Darin, lets just open everything up. Zero Moderation. Do away with the moderators, Super Mods, Me and You. Let Rick post up something for sale, have 50 people post dump it to death, but that is ok, he will not sell the item he was trying to sell because of all the crap.

I don't sell parts, I break them.

:kiss:

Rick

 

[The Penguin]

QuickMick,

I understand what you are saying, but Kennay posting in a new thread with a link to the BombThreat thread would have the same effect as jumping into the BombThreat thread.

BombThreat vs Nick and Kennay vs Nick are two separate transactions and should be treated as such. Someone mentioned e-bay transactions before, and that is a perfect analogy.

Kennay was dragged into that thread by Nick - what is your solution for that?

 

[sflsurfrider]

Kennay was dragged into that thread by Nick - what is your solution for that?

ban me, maybe?

 

[The Penguin]

forgot my Mod password - you get a reprieve.

 

[The Penguin]

for now. :biggrin:

 

[WFO Speedracer]

I disagree that you can't please anyone,do whatever you like,you will anyway and franky I don't give a rats ass either way.




















ps: anarchy rules

 

[Kennay]

ban me, maybe?

Damn it man, you're cracking me up today :laugh2:

 

[Kennay]

Kennay was dragged into that thread by Nick - what is your solution for that?

Aye. The only reason I didn't make my own thread earlier is because I knew all it would turn into is a Nick and all of his buddies versus me thread.


and


Rick, you're still my homeboy, homeboy :439:

 

[Rickster]

Kennay was dragged into that thread by Nick - what is your solution for that?

Yes, Nick referenced Kennay's hood and Kennay rightly jumped in to clear his name under the current format.

Would the same result not have been achieved if BombThreat and Nick were left to dance and Kennay started a new negative feedback thread quoting Nick in the original thread?

The bottom line in the posts by Members that had no stake in the thread were adding fuel to the fire. If they liked Nicks work so much, they have a 'positive feedback' area that they are able to post their experiences on.

Positive and Negative feedbacks are advertisements/warnings to others Members, and regardles of whether Nicks repair job on a nose is well done or not, it has absolutely nothing to do with the product that he turned out for BombThreat and Kennay.

 

[Rickster]

Rick, you're still my homeboy, homeboy :439:

It's only cause I'm black, right?

:afro:

 

[GIL]

ban me, maybe?

Got my vote! LOL

Charile, if u really want to get banned, all have to do is post this ':crying:' and u get a 12 hour vacation. It really is that simple, hmmm, or is it? Maybe you just have to be on the 'chosen' list to get banned. LOL

Yall did send me a pm asking for my 2cents, right? Well, now you got it. LOL

As far as the original idea behind this post- I proudly voted for option#2.

ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:

 

[GIL]

It's only cause I'm black, right?

:afro:

OMG, so you are telling me I let a black chik do me? LMAO-how u been?

 

[Matt_E]

Got my vote! LOL

Charile, if u really want to get banned, all have to do is post this ':crying:' and u get a 12 hour vacation. It really is that simple, hmmm, or is it? Maybe you just have to be on the 'chosen' list to get banned. LOL

Yall did send me a pm asking for my 2cents, right? Well, now you got it. LOL

As far as the original idea behind this post- I proudly voted for option#2.

ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:ancake:

You got it all wrong.

Let me explain it.
First, we single out Charlie. There's at least one mod permanently shadowing Charlie to find the first bannable offense. If he hasn't committed one within 24 hours, we make up a new rule that applies retro-actively, only to Charlie.
Second, we single out you and some others in your circle of friends.
Third, we do everything possible to protect Nick.

That's the jist of it. Every mod has to sign a blood pledge and participate in a satanic ritual annually to re-affirm adherence to those rules. We also get together and sacrifice a goat to Dave Ramsey every month.