What Pete may be buying???

Roo

it's all good
Site Supporter
Trinity's Weight to Strength ratio is so far beyond everything else I have seen in the industry. Sorry but its true, if it hurts say ouch.

I believe Trinity Composites could have built the FS-1 with better materials, lay up techniques, etc, then Cobra Composites could have, but I am liking the design of the FS-1 better - mainly the nose. Also the adjustable holds and ULTRA wide tray.

The shorter nose will help better for nosing in with a lower hp motor on backy's - Trinity's still has the nose protruding a little bit more, causing less of an arch up on the bottom hull (less pop).

Ya, I know I sound like the promo video... haha

I know what I bought and got myself into... and plan to enjoy it :Banane26:
 
Last edited:

tbaer

USMC
Location
BEAUFORT SC
i vote FS-1 they just look bad azz. better yet get bobby to make an fs-1 style boat and that my friend would probably be the strongest lightest most agile boat on the water. i love the way the fs-1 looks the nose is awesome i wish i could test one out!
 

Trinity Composites

Lightweight Evolution
Location
Palm Bay, FL
I believe Trinity Composites could have built the FS-1 with better materials, lay up techniques, etc, then Cobra Composites could have, but I am liking the design of the FS-1 better - mainly the nose. Also the adjustable holds and ULTRA wide tray.

The shorter nose will help better for nosing in with a lower hp motor on backy's - Trinity's still has the nose protruding a little bit more, causing less of an arch up on the bottom hull (less pop).

Ya, I know I sound like the promo video... haha

I know what I bought and got myself into... and plan to enjoy it :Banane26:
My Matrix hull is shorter in the nose, also has much more rocker in the hull to the nose than the rrp (more arch). It is wider in the hull, upper and tray. The Matrix nose looks longer because the pole is not pushed forward for a few reasons. Not arguing, just explaining what might not be seen in the pics. I'll put up some better pics of the botom soon. Thanks for all the comments on the quality that is being seen in my product.
 
P

PancakePete

Guest
My top Choices Fs-1, Matrix, SJ, FX1, Mafia Style.:beerchug:
 
FX-1s are cheap.......I have about $3500 into my "Frankenstein FX" and that includes about $1500 for the paint!

Also have ridden approx 200+ tanks (determined by the 28 gals of oil I've used) through it and haven't done any wrenching but change plugs a couple times.....that's hard to beat.

Oh yeah......they're light too!
 

Flash-FX

No Square..No Round..FX-1
The "FX-Mafia" FX-1's are fashioned with the idea behind the "Swiss Army Knife". Not one specific way of riding, but to do a good job at surf, wide open blasts through the creeks, and general carving turns. They are FUN boats that we are continually tweaking. Not everybody can say that about the Superjet.

Remember,it's just a hobby for us.
 
you have hulls built for smooth riders and hulls for huge hard riders.I remember what happened to petes lighter hull......wasnt perty. big hp trumps & =s out a sturdy heavier surf hull
How many pounds does the reinforcement add to the fs1 to make it huge hard surf worthy?divide that # by and extra 50 hp,the resulting # is the % of difference it would make,lol anyone see the the height that heavy weight wcf hull was flying.....lol

fishing although it be,I can guess what he will end up with _ _ _ _ !
 
^^^^ The only Composite company that I have never heard of ANY Failures is Trinity. They also seem to be the lightest. No reinforcing Necessary :bananapowerslide:

Some day everyone will understand. :nana:
 

butti

lone wolf
Location
F-XTC
^^^^ The only Composite company that I have never heard of ANY Failures is Trinity. They also seem to be the lightest. No reinforcing Necessary :bananapowerslide:

Some day everyone will understand. :nana:



how many hulls has trinity produced?how many are on the water?
 
Top Bottom