I would say the title of thread should say: "Who is glad they've never dealt with Dan/Highroller?", not "Who's glad they didn't buy a stunt?". I've ridden Waternut's enough to say that it's a nice "finished" product. It's always in transition since John is forever trying new options on his ski, but he has it setup so that it WANTS to get out of the water and in the air. He's running a 701 with sport porting and it is plenty capable of BF's, and rolls...with a rider better than me. All in all the stunt is a fine ski. The catch is that you have to put a TON of R&D in to get it correct. Not a problem if you know that going in. The bad press on here has forever doomed those who have one and want to sell them. However, I would be much more inclined to buy a used one that has had most of the bugs worked out and then it's simple fit and finish for the new owner to get it right. I have never owned an A/M hull, but when going from my RN to Waternuts stunt you can feel immediately that his setup is lighter and more nimble. You can buy nicer hulls for sure, but you know that you won't get any of those hulls or even kits for $1500...not even a top deck. I don't give one ounce of crap about Dan or his ski's, but for those who've invested time, money, blood, sweat, etc in stunts the bashing should take a back seat. Between Chad, Sanoman, Waternut, and NCBrock I think there is a template for how to get one done correct. I'd like to see someone push a stunt hull and see what it can and can't handle. Screw Dan (Highroller), but don't forget those who've bought his stuff are "one of us" not "one of them."