I used that prop last yr with a stock 701 sn. Great prop for a lot less $ than the newer stuff and rips outta the hole but still has the fast top so if your cruising to a location you can carry 35+ mph without killing your motor
I was just saying dont take your aluminum pole to the scrap yard. Those are expensive. I have no input other than that. Everyone else seems to be saying cut a rn pole.
This thread has just turned into the age old motocross 2 vs 4 debate. That one is 10+ years old now like pondracer said. The points I was speaking on have to do with the industry as a whole. Race motors will always require more up keep than recreational motors. How many valve adjustments and...
That aluminum pole is like 450 bucks. I have that exact one on the exact same ski. Do what you want im just sayin u can sell that for at least a couple hundred maybe more. Great ski btw
Thats a great point. thanks for speaking for ronnie renner. I get it. its a forum everybody just wants to haggle with each other. cool. I was just speaking in general those would be my points of opinion.
3 points
#1 Weight: This one would be my first priority for freestyle sports whether its MX freestyle, jetski freestyle, snowmobiling in technical backcountry, or any application where very responsive handling is required. 2 stroke motors carry much less weight generally.
#2 Reliability: 4...
The total amount of volume that is occupied by an air/fuel mixture, the compression, and the valve/port and ignition timing would all be calculated into some equation that would make most of our heads hurt. But those would be the variables.
I wouldnt be able to answer your specific q but can comment that your ring end gap at 10deg F versus operating temp will be pretty drastic. As im sure you know the rings will grow when you put fire on them.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.