^^^def. lowrider mini scheme!^^^
It's not a matter of clearance to the bottom of the hull. The +2 intake tunnel puts the indent for the grate right behind the bulkhead. So if the bolt and insert were at the bottom for the mid shaft they would hit and go through the hull into the front of your intake grate. I just ran into the same issue on our new hull.It doesnt hit the bottom of the bildge , I can spin it 360 with room to spare. Looks like plenty of room to set it up stock. Would be nice to be able to use the rubber thingamajig .
No one likes a show off Swampmeat
Yup , we figured that out , well that and flashy paint on a Honda Civic changes everything.It's not a matter of clearance to the bottom of the hull. The +2 intake tunnel puts the indent for the grate right behind the bulkhead. So if the bolt and insert were at the bottom for the mid shaft they would hit and go through the hull into the front of your intake grate. I just ran into the same issue on our new hull.
No. I'll only dump on air Blairs thread cause we are friends.Since this thread isnt about chans any more and mini trucks arent that cool, lets talk about the new Rage Composites hull?!?!
<------ Minitrucker
what a hack job... Your missing a logo son! wtf! ///
Ruh-RohThe latest scoop is the bare hull, bonded, with footholds installed is 112 lbs. Eek.
That was only Malone and Lenzi in the early 2000's112??? didnt know it was a surf hull.... still love the sleek low profile of this thing.
and im playing about wieght. i would much rather have a ski durable than one that was built for a few comps and then would be replaced by sponsors. because it seems to me thats how most were being built.
Rickter xfr or xfs are 110lbs and they are getting tossed around...
I still have mixed feelings on this 112 lbs..
obviously the weight isn't ideal for a "perfect" Flatwater hull.
I don't think the weight will be an issue in front of a small boat wake or some waves... Do you?