Freestyle new rrp carbon pipe

Byeai

"Cheetos-Man"
Location
Melbourne FL
I wasn't trying to be rude or anything honestly just giving you my mistakes and solutions

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
 
I had that issue in my last hull with PFP too, I water locked my 1200 a few times, I started tilting the ski to the side when re-starting also. In my Trixstar I ran a raised, mandrel bent exhaust tube and I haven't had any more issues. I can kneel in the tray and rest for a few seconds, restart it and have no issues, it's nice!
 
Location
Stockton
Wasn't at all taken that way, so no worries.

Plus side mounting can help in other ways too, rear mounting in deep water is hard on the shoulders so I'am glad your mentioning it, I need a new method to board it :)

Thanks @Byeai
 
Why not run a scupper or one way valve in the exhaust? Plenty of boats run a rubber flap somewhere down the line. I'm sure you could find something the correct size.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
My waterbox is not raised, only sitting on turf on the battery base. My Rickter exhaust tube in the hull is very low so there is a steep angle from the waterbox. The waterbox pissers is 1/4" on mine and teed off of one of the 4 outgoing pissers on the head.
 
Location
Stockton
My waterbox is not raised, only sitting on turf on the battery base. My Rickter exhaust tube in the hull is very low so there is a steep angle from the waterbox. The waterbox pissers is 1/4" on mine and teed off of one of the 4 outgoing pissers on the head.

Oh ok, from the picks it looks higher in relation to the top of the tank and carb plate than mine. Pics can be misleading for sure. Thanks for clarifying that stuff
 
Location
Off Site
IMG_20141004_090249622.jpg
I had a back flow problem, so I made my own set up to create a plumbing trap. Better to go up then Down. I did a test down on the lake with the water box off. With a straight tube is rediculous how much water rushes in. No more back flow problems.

The only bummer part is its up by the carbs, a 2" might be better there. I just had to massage it but now the carb mounting plate is a lot easier to install and remove.
 
Location
Stockton
So I found another rider with the back flow problem so that's makes 4 so far....

The weekend before last water flowed into my engine again just putting ski on the trailer...

After this I went ahead and raised the water box 2 inches and put more angle in the box outlet pluming down to the bulkhead exit.

Now my stinger tip is above the water line just a little.

My question, will raising the stinger 2 inches higher than the manifold exit cause injected water to back flow some ?
 
View attachment 260730
I had a back flow problem, so I made my own set up to create a plumbing trap. Better to go up then Down. I did a test down on the lake with the water box off. With a straight tube is rediculous how much water rushes in. No more back flow problems.

The only bummer part is its up by the carbs, a 2" might be better there. I just had to massage it but now the carb mounting plate is a lot easier to install and remove.
that WDK rokR 1200 i bought from steve a couple years ago, kept drowning the motor with back flow too. i made a P trap similar to yours but i bought the silicone hoses off ebay for cheap. you can buy 90s and 180s and it looks clean with less clamps.
 
Location
Stockton
Remembered on my limited ski I had type 4 dry pipe and I was injecting water into the manifolds coupler end and I had no issues with the injected water getting into the cylinders and that's an up and over pipe so looks like I can raise the stinger end of the RRP as high as I want

Iam within 2 inches of the hood lip now after raising it last week
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    70 KB · Views: 133
Last edited:
Location
Stockton
its a tiny water box, if you set it right on the floor of the hull where say the battery would normally go it can easily be below the lakes water surface level...

Not everyone with the same model hull has experienced the issue....

Anothor 2 are same brand but not sure if both are the same model and only one has experienced the issue.

My hull has no flotation so I'd assume it rests lower in the water than say a hull with flotation.

How you restart in deep water and how long you let it float matter too.

With just technique Ive been able to avoid the issue until i could attempt a fix
 

yamanube

This Is The Way
Staff member
Location
Mandalor
I had some back flow issues on my 66E/WDK pipe setup, that paired with the small gas tank was enough to make me get rid of the setup.
 
My hull has no flotation so I'd assume it rests lower in the water than say a hull with flotation.
A ski with no added would float the tiniest bit higher in the water than one with foam due to the added weight of the foam. Foam doesn't affect anything till your boat sinks. Once full of water, your no foam boat will be much, much lower under the water than a foam filled one...
 
Location
Stockton
A ski with no added would float the tiniest bit higher in the water than one with foam due to the added weight of the foam. Foam doesn't affect anything till your boat sinks. Once full of water, your no foam boat will be much, much lower under the water than a foam filled one...

Sound good on the surface but I disagree

Most foam used in this application has a positive buoyancy and it's density is less than water, floating itself and adding some floatation to whatever it's attached too....

The orange bowling ball weighs 8 pounds and has less density than the water so it floats

It's not about weight, it's about density's

image.jpg
 
Location
Off Site
is the exh outlet in side the hull much lower in the hulls that are having these issues than others that dont seem to be a issue?

Good point, I had to lower my exhaust tube so my foot holds would clear. My Vengeance had the holds way in the back, i could stand it. I ended up getting some Thrust holds. I pushed the foot holds more forward and dropped the exhaust tube to clear.
 
Last edited:
Sound good on the surface but I disagree

Most foam used in this application has a positive buoyancy and it's density is less than water, floating itself and adding some floatation to whatever it's attached too....

The orange bowling ball weighs 8 pounds and has less density than the water so it floats

It's not about weight, it's about density's

View attachment 262303
I agree with Speedy. In order for something to float, it must weigh less than the water it displaces. Assuming there is no water inside a hull, the foam would add a tiny bit of weight and cause the hull to sit a tiny bit lower in the water. Now assuming the hull is full of water, the foam displaces water making the ski more buoyant. Hope this helps...
 
Last edited:
is the exh outlet in side the hull much lower in the hulls that are having these issues than others that dont seem to be a issue?
a lot of AM hulls just run a straight pipe from the exit to the bulkhead and some of them at the bottom to clear footholds. this creates a backflow problem. some hulls use a nice S bend and get the tube high on the bulkhead like most stock hulls . every bend after the stinger is a potential restriction that can hamper performance. on my rokR i made a P trap out of 1 3/4" tube since that was the stinger exit size. it was so restrictive, it had zero power. i changed it to 2.5" and what power it had,came back.
 
Location
Stockton
Speedy's post made me wonder, So I studied flotation and bouncy for a 45 minutes this morning.

I learned about density's and specific gravity and that an objects density in comparison to the liquids density its in is what produce flotation, not the objects weight. Some of its in #236

If I get in the lake and float upright and mark the water level on my body it prolly be around say the middle of my head. Now if I put on a life vest and took another measurement I would find I've risen out of the water dispite the weight of the foam in the life vest, positive bouncy

Am I missing something here?
 
Top Bottom