Byeai
"Cheetos-Man"
- Location
- Melbourne FL
I wasn't trying to be rude or anything honestly just giving you my mistakes and solutions
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
My waterbox is not raised, only sitting on turf on the battery base. My Rickter exhaust tube in the hull is very low so there is a steep angle from the waterbox. The waterbox pissers is 1/4" on mine and teed off of one of the 4 outgoing pissers on the head.
that WDK rokR 1200 i bought from steve a couple years ago, kept drowning the motor with back flow too. i made a P trap similar to yours but i bought the silicone hoses off ebay for cheap. you can buy 90s and 180s and it looks clean with less clamps.View attachment 260730
I had a back flow problem, so I made my own set up to create a plumbing trap. Better to go up then Down. I did a test down on the lake with the water box off. With a straight tube is rediculous how much water rushes in. No more back flow problems.
The only bummer part is its up by the carbs, a 2" might be better there. I just had to massage it but now the carb mounting plate is a lot easier to install and remove.
A ski with no added would float the tiniest bit higher in the water than one with foam due to the added weight of the foam. Foam doesn't affect anything till your boat sinks. Once full of water, your no foam boat will be much, much lower under the water than a foam filled one...My hull has no flotation so I'd assume it rests lower in the water than say a hull with flotation.
A ski with no added would float the tiniest bit higher in the water than one with foam due to the added weight of the foam. Foam doesn't affect anything till your boat sinks. Once full of water, your no foam boat will be much, much lower under the water than a foam filled one...
is the exh outlet in side the hull much lower in the hulls that are having these issues than others that dont seem to be a issue?
I agree with Speedy. In order for something to float, it must weigh less than the water it displaces. Assuming there is no water inside a hull, the foam would add a tiny bit of weight and cause the hull to sit a tiny bit lower in the water. Now assuming the hull is full of water, the foam displaces water making the ski more buoyant. Hope this helps...Sound good on the surface but I disagree
Most foam used in this application has a positive buoyancy and it's density is less than water, floating itself and adding some floatation to whatever it's attached too....
The orange bowling ball weighs 8 pounds and has less density than the water so it floats
It's not about weight, it's about density's
View attachment 262303
a lot of AM hulls just run a straight pipe from the exit to the bulkhead and some of them at the bottom to clear footholds. this creates a backflow problem. some hulls use a nice S bend and get the tube high on the bulkhead like most stock hulls . every bend after the stinger is a potential restriction that can hamper performance. on my rokR i made a P trap out of 1 3/4" tube since that was the stinger exit size. it was so restrictive, it had zero power. i changed it to 2.5" and what power it had,came back.is the exh outlet in side the hull much lower in the hulls that are having these issues than others that dont seem to be a issue?