Quinc
Buy a Superjet
- Location
- California
Coffman is fine. To make it better open the manifold and head pipe to 46mm and port match the cylinder side of it to match your gasket.
There's nothing wrong with the Coffman pipe, you just mentioned you where looking for more midrange and there are other pipes that make more power.Thanks for the explanation, it makes a lot more sense to me now. About the Sizzler, so far its working fine and has decent feedback from most, im sure its not as good as a bpipe but its got pretty good bottom end from what I understand, I have no frame of reference however as I have only ridden this superjet with this configuration but it spanks the crap out of my well tuned 650sx. I dried it out a lot and it really livened it up a bit in the midrange and up top without sacrificing much down low. What is your issue with the Coffman? It came with the ski for 500 bucks total, granted I had to rebuild everything, but it was a hell of a jump start.
Thank you for your feedback and I am going to start studying up on porting, looks like I have a winter project.
I only match the two to the gasket.@yamanube when you use a 62t cylinder what do you do as far as "porting" the exhaust manifold to match the cylinder?
There's nothing wrong with the Coffman pipe, you just mentioned you where looking for more midrange and there are other pipes that make more power.
Maybe coming from dirt bikes I have a colored perspective of tuning, I may not have the basics down. Some pipes in the mx world will give you midrange and top end but nuke the bottom, same goes for the bottom end pipes nuking top end. I guess I assumed that going with a midrange/top end pipe I would lose a lot of the bottom end hit this coffman makes, I also assumed that the slightly different port timing of the 62t may liven up the midrange and top end just by its nature.
Bottom line it seems is a decent port job will help any cylinder make power however the ski is still only the sum of its parts. Programmable ignition is an eventuality for me however a rebuild is bound to be in my future as both halves of the engine already had hours on them (62t/61x) so Im planning for an engine rebuild before much else.
I do, message me.You wouldn't happen to have made any for the poor little Yamaha 650 would you?
Hiw xan i get templates for portingAlso works great on the 1100!
We have spoken in PMs but I didn't want to leave this hanging in the conversation here. I have ported a couple of 760 cylinders with this and they have run very well. The only difference in the 64X 760 cylinder is my template hangs down into the exhaust port slightly because this cylinder has a taller port than the 62T 701 or 61X cylinder. I was making a template specifically for this at first but decided it was unnecessary and simple enough to blend the top corners in.Has anyone used these for porting a 760? Wondering how they perform over stock?
I would like to purchase one of these templates. Can you you please send me a PM. I am new to the site so I can't message yet. ThanksWe have spoken in PMs but I didn't want to leave this hanging in the conversation here. I have ported a couple of 760 cylinders with this and they have run very well. The only difference in the 64X 760 cylinder is my template hangs down into the exhaust port slightly because this cylinder has a taller port than the 62T 701 or 61X cylinder. I was making a template specifically for this at first but decided it was unnecessary and simple enough to blend the top corners in.
I’m interested in buying a 61x / 62t Templar’s pleaseThis template is great. Super easy to use and the instructions are straight forward. I've never done any kind of porting or engine work in my life and was able to take mine apart, port it, and reassemble it and have it run better than it did. I haven't been able to ride it since completing the work, but it seems to rev a bit quicker and have better throttle response.