- Location
- Hutchinson, Kansas
Awesome job! The first pic in the last set looks killer!! :headbang:
thanks flash, i really enjoyed your build and really want to do something like that in the future.
Awesome job! The first pic in the last set looks killer!! :headbang:
on what?, if your asking about my hull bare hull will be around 95lbs, it's my closest guess for now, because I don't know exactly till I finish foaming and reinforcing the engine compartment , i will post weight when it's a complete bare bottom hull.what's the weight on that?
The only thing I don't like about this build is the copper tubing, it seems cheap in comparison to the rest... maybe im wrong, it wouldnt be the first time, ive lost count...
I love the rest though
I would have used mcmaster part # 9929T153...
Coppper tubing is bad because?
I could put gold plated lines in it and somebody wouldn't like it, but its no big deal. I listen to every piece of advice or opinion on my builds , good or bad, then I decide what im going to use. I've been saved from big mistakes several times by other people. I'm just using parts I think that will work, I may and probably will have several failures.
This ski is purpose built for the majority of my riding, (rough water chop). I don't compete flatwater freestyle, race buoys or ride ocean waves (except maybe 4 days a year. I've had waterdawg hulls and superjets for the past 10 years and want to try a wider platform, I'm getting older and they are much less work, however the oem sxr and octane motor and driveline are not exactly what I like , so I decided to try something new. The superjet is a wonderful platform, however I've found a motor that I like, but it changes the normal superjet characteristics imo.
Most of my parts are stuff i tried before and been satified with the results (I've used copper tubing for trim cable tubes before with no issues, but again I ride freshwater 98% of the time) Most likely I would have used aluminum if i known there was corrosion problem in salt water with the copper, but it's too late now, those things are buried.
I don't claim to know what I"m doing, I've barely even fiberglass'd before this build. I've already got plans for a bigger build yet, but need to learn in steps
Seems to me a Light weight SXR based lower with a 66e motor would be the SHiet!
great info! Is it the added weight of the motor?
I think I already know the answer.
SO even just your stock cylinder, bigbore, ported, 66e realy had that much more power then a 8 mil stroke Lamey 62T motor? :eek5: Thats awsome if so
Seems to me a Light weight SXR based lower with a 66e motor would be the SHiet!