Search results

Yeah no worries. I had a feeling you meant a high tenths place.

High 50's stock class SXR, WHAT? Also even 1mph for a stock boat would be huge, not to mention extremely cost effective mod for a lites boat.

Anyone have experience with running these? 2MPH over stock is a BOLD claim. http://www.elprofessor.fr/index.php?id_product=2638&controller=product&id_lang=2 If this is true, it's hard to believe this is not talked about more. Seem to be hard to find, but look like a part that could easily...

For future, the epoxy wont stick to duct tape. So line the cardboard with that and it should release.

There is still a gasket there like mikidymac said. It is just hard to understand via text. Look at this picture. 8 and 8 are both paper gaskets. One touches the case but the reed block technically covers some of it. .

You-"Please dont cut up your ski and gut the tray thinking new foam will solve it!! It would be easier to lose 25lbs off your body!" Nice try but I didn't say this.^^^ Skimmed those threads quick and it looks 70% of the posts say noob rider error, 29.5% say to change equipment. Sorry you're...

"I dont go full speed often" - You dont know how to ride YOUR ski. "Weight is not an issue" - You literally just said that reducing items encompassing the weight of the rear of the ski is not an issue. "It's not rider error" - this is debatable. Never pushed back against you defoaming your ski...

Have you ever been on a ski that you couldn't instantly ride really well? Also his buddies RN could be a 08+ that hooks up like crazy with pump position set back, nose glued down all the time compared to an old superjet. I have no idea how his ski is built, it could be a POS mess in the...

Hmmmmmm.... These posts are conflicting with your theories, reasoning, and sense of skill. I'm going to say you don't know how to ride your ski own ski, sorry! Everyones superjet is waterlogged.

Good luck, but I really doubt this is your problem.

Probably because the price of a clean fx1, you can sharpen the budget just a little bit and have a way better riding hull. People hype fx1's because they are rare, but in reality they are bad for cruising, don't hook up, and aren't capable of doing any more tricks than your average superjet...

To add to this, I sold a fully done up lites class superjet last year for 5500. As others have said, as long as you aren't fishing for a sucker to buy it at 6.5k+, itll sell in a reasonable time at 5-6k depending on what you have.

Listen, you can do whatever you want, but for another $50-75 you can make 100% sure you won’t have to replace it. Also yes SN boxes are not going to flow if you run a engine worth any power.

It'll feel pretty restricted when the fiberglass inevitably blows apart. SN box is trash, don't do it.

You a little late, sorry!

I dont think so.. I would guess tubbie 1's. The 2's had a pretty defined chine on the fat area of the tubbie. Too hard to tell from a picture if they're even for a superjet, you'd have to take measurements and compare. At bare minimum at least test fit them on a hull to see if the contour...

Who then? Since when? I don’t care what anyone says, not all 08+ superjets handle the same, even from the same year. They have some variation for sure. Some feel much more aggressive than others

I applaud your effort for wanting to optimize water pressure for every time you ride the ski by adjusting restrictors in the lines, but experience tells me this is a wasted effort and the gains you'll experience from this will be unnoticeable once you get the ski on the water and dialed in...

So you intend to increase cooling capacity by introducing dual cooling... Yet you also intend to reduce overall cooling by adding restrictors on the overboard lines? I'm not sure I follow this logic. Have you done a calculation to determine that you will be overcooling the motor now, or...

Yes, maybe it wasn't clear.. This is exactly what I was trying to say.