So install it then ?The difference between your method and the pdf document is that you
measured the difference of the pick-up coil, located in relation to tdc. If the
reluctor begins at 47 deg btdc, your measurement would be correct.
The pdf is instructing us to measure where the reluctor begins in relation to the
pick-up coil and tdc. Both my measurements of the stock reluctor position
and the specs provided by Wax indicate that at 47 deg btdc the reluctor and
the pick-up coil are overlapping.
Unfortunately Wax's method of using the timing light is only useful with a Zeel
already installed. Otherwise if you are trying to measure the static angle on a
stock engine on the bench, you would need to make an elaborate jig, or drill
a hole in the front cover.
Bill M.
No I have never had an issueBut verifying with a light is probably a good idea. You would put whatever your measured/guessed static angle is in the software and program some convenient straight curve, say straight 15 degrees. Check with a light that you are actually getting 15 degrees, if not adjust static angle in software until you are getting the correct actual angle.
As WMAZZ is pointing out (I think) it's hard to say where exactly the pickup is physically located relative to the flywheel when it triggers the cdi.
I haven't actually tried this myself, has anybody? I'm wondering if there is any issue with using a plain old ordinary automotive timing light. I've heard that they can have issues with cdi ignitions.
How critical is the length of the reluctor? Does zeeltronics only care about where it starts?
This is also my understanding.From what folks have been saying it sounds like, beginning at your first programmed point, all that matters is the start. Before that point, it uses the trailing edge to decrease idle timing. This assumes you have the “use + and -“ setting checked.
Someone correct me if I’m wrong
Wmazz
Why are you trying to complicate this so much.
All the new Zeels ship with 47 SA and I also confirmed with Borut through email.Because I am anal retentive and people are relying on me to tell them how
to build this.
Wax, my comments were directed towards Beerdart. I thought that was obvious.
I said in the beginning that I understood Storbeck's explanation of SA back in #805.
Your response was "Mint Answer" My problem was my specs for the reluctor didn't
jive with the 56 deg static angle (SA).
A problem with this thread is people have quoted multiple Kawasaki static angle
specs (47, 54, 56), even though the zeel came with instructions for a 56' SA. But now
we know how the 47' specs were determined.
I also posted my sketches, in the hope someone (maybe Wax) would confirm my
specs before we sent it to the machine shop, and nobody commented on them
except Beerdart. Unfortunately even Borut only restated the obvious.
Thankfully Beerdart posted his information and that info (and my measurements)
explained why a 56' degree SA works.
Thank You Beerdart!
Actually, I'm still not sure, it sounds like you're making something custom.
To be fair, I'm not sure how anybody would have read your comments and thought you were just
wondering what the correct static angle for a Kawasaki is.
What did you end up with jetting wise?About 5-7 years ago I built a 5mm stroker. Ported etc for a friend, 46 mm mikuni b-pipe etc. I never got to tune it. However I was talking to him about the zeeltronic and got him interested. He pulled the pin and went for it. We put the wax2 curve in it and I rejeted his carbs. It walked my own surf ski so badly even I was shocked. He had eyes like saucers and was so happy. Like he had just had his first female ha ha. The change in the ski was outstanding. We had pulled out an enhancer and lightened flywheel
same curve. the difference is really only noticeable on the bottom end and its not very drastic. You'll get more bottom end "pop" with the TL FW in my experienceQuestion for you all that I should probably know the answer to. I was running a lightened charging GP flywheel with Wax's preinstalled curve. I swapped in my lightened TL flywheel but did not notice much power improvement over charging. Is there a different timing curve I should be using for TL vs charging, all other things being equal?
Yea, underwhelming for sure. I do feel slightly more low end with the TL FW but everything else feels about the same.