Why don't I ever see dyno's?

Tyrant1919

Site Supporter
Location
Washington, DC
If anybody ever mentions thebuzzard around me, I make sure to tell them that he's really a big teddy bear. He's a good skier and indeed has a lot of knowledge. Not to mention a warehouse of ski parts we all wish we had.

On another note, this thread is wonderful.
 

Big Kahuna

Administrator
Location
Tuscaloosa, AL
If anybody ever mentions thebuzzard around me, I make sure to tell them that he's really a big teddy bear. He's a good skier and indeed has a lot of knowledge. Not to mention a warehouse of ski parts we all wish we had.

On another note, this thread is wonderful.
In person I bet he is. His attitude 9s what got me plus he was given a few warnings. He just has an abrasive personality online.
 
yes just please ignore from now on,unless we can get something positive out of it,I dont post negative at all,even when I should. I do not break the rules of the forum at all,But somehow it still gets hot and nasty as satans toe nails in here from the "team" if you follow a complement with a request for something other than more hype.
You pretend that you haven't been negative and say you are nothing but positive and everyone else is the bad guy.
Truth is this thread got closer than ever to getting Dyno results and you, only you chased of the only chance there was as Tnt started letting a little out. Then you peed him off so he ripped you one, you messed it up, accepting that is step 1!
This thread is a fine example of why tuners/vendors stay off the forum!
PS, let it die until next year!
 
Last edited:
BadV Calling bs on that one too. I did nothing but complement him as a tuner and the pipe as a product. Sorry if asking for factual torq curves compared to a pfp is more than some of you can handle. Only leaves the rest of us to wonder why ?
 
tnt said he would never give up dyno results in fear of opposition steeling his pipe design.

He also said dyno numbers are pretty useless to any of us in here cause we'd have no clue what to do with them except have peepee sword fights with the numbers.
 

tntsuperjet

Tntperformance-engineering.com
Location
Georgetown ca
There something else you guys have left out.
1- MB didn't pods me of at all.
I have thick skin and as long as people stay none personal I can take a good challenge all day long.
2nd. I can't post dyno numbers of engine builders who give me motors to develop pipes.
If I develop a pipe for my engines there very tuner oriented products and don't fit the mass requirements
So I took a new approach and developed a pipe on motors I have no idea what's inside other then there claimed cc size.
Is it fair for me to post a dyno curve of someone else's product on a dyno that has been modified from its original state to better serve a pump type drive load but has never had the proper calibrations done to read true corrected horse power??
But my dyno reads lower then anyone's I have compared to,but it is very repeatable and serves my purpose well.
But one thing MB, the only claim I make right now is we make 14 average horse power over RRP pipe.
2 less peak horse power then PFP.
WE HAVE THE BEST AVERAGE HORSE POWER.
Our pipe is very easy to tune and will cover a wider tune range then anyone pipe available.
If you want proof buy one. If it doesn't do what I say you get 100 refund.
That is no gadget or latest cutest dress at the dance.
That's what I can offer because I know if a tuner has any skills at all he will find the same results, and if they can't I don't want you to have my product and willing to buy it back.
 
wow bravo..much more informative to the average consumer. Alot of us me included prefer the rrp pipe over the pfp cause we know it makes its power in the lower range,but more importantly you can tune the water in the pipe to work with a broader range of setup in motor,ign,pump with out changing everything else around the pipe. Ive tinkered with the stinger recently and adding extra water close to the stinger,its pretty easy to tune. IT sounds like you have made a better mouse trap than the rrp with tuning ease in stainless material with better heat sig and water injected for quicker tuning,plus much less involved than building a dry pipe with a inner layer. Most will want to know how it stacks up to pfp in average hp
 
I have a question for the wise, how come that you say that no dyno can reproduce the load of a pump when it is easy to get a dyno with an electric generator as a load with programmable load curve/rpm input? It is totally possible to get a custom load from a dyno, but I accept that it would cost a bit of money. I just don't buy that this is an impossible feat, because it is not. A bigger hurdle is if there is a marked supporting the cost for such equipment
 

swapmeet

Brotastic
Location
Arlington TX
I have a question for the wise, how come that you say that no dyno can reproduce the load of a pump when it is easy to get a dyno with an electric generator as a load with programmable load curve/rpm input? It is totally possible to get a custom load from a dyno, but I accept that it would cost a bit of money. I just don't buy that this is an impossible feat, because it is not. A bigger hurdle is if there is a marked supporting the cost for such equipment

Interesting... I never knew that was possible.



Can we stop making TNT the be all end all? He doesn't want to share his data, and thats fine, he shouldn't be pressured to supply the info. But he's not the only source in the universe. He builds pipes, not motors. And he's using this thread to market his pipes.


Look, If a engine builder creates a package and supports the performance with dyno data, more people will buy parts from that builder. It all works in favor of the riders as we get the best performing package. And it works out for the builders because they put in the effort to show how well their product performs and they get more business.





BTW Buzzard was abrasive as 40 grit sand paper on this forum. Definitely knowledgeable and no doubt could ride, but you can't kick sand at everyone who disagrees with you, especially the mods, and get to stay on the forum.
 

tntsuperjet

Tntperformance-engineering.com
Location
Georgetown ca
I have a question for the wise, how come that you say that no dyno can reproduce the load of a pump when it is easy to get a dyno with an electric generator as a load with programmable load curve/rpm input? It is totally possible to get a custom load from a dyno, but I accept that it would cost a bit of money. I just don't buy that this is an impossible feat, because it is not. A bigger hurdle is if there is a marked supporting the cost for such equipment
Your absolutely right.
But here the problem.
I take data log of the boat on the water. Aka log how long it takes to go from idle to peak RPM.
Load that sweep time into the dyno and it take .83 seconds.
So you are trying to replicate dyno sweeps and get consonant data Ina sweet that is less then 1 second long.
 

tshank123

Yo hablo ingles
Location
Vegas
Interesting... I never knew that was possible.

BTW Buzzard was abrasive as 40 grit sand paper on this forum. Definitely knowledgeable and no doubt could ride, but you can't kick sand at everyone who disagrees with you, especially the mods, and get to stay on the forum.

I dont know what got him banned eventually, but it must of been pretty bad considering he threatened to shoot me in one post and didn't get banned.
 

tntsuperjet

Tntperformance-engineering.com
Location
Georgetown ca
I recently have gotten to know the buzzard, and I have a lot of hardware on our K1 triple build I collected parts from his bone yard.
I can see how he comes across as abrasive and harsh.
But he is a decent guy. He won't give his parts away by no means but he runs his parts sales like a business, the parts that are getting harder to get he charges higher dollar for.
But I have also learned something else about buzzard.
If you do something for him that he needs, he def returns the favor.
I will ask the powers above to un ban him.
I will be the first to say I have some data I don't want to give away.

Here are the things I have run across that bother me on the X
People who always take the negative way to attack you without the proper backing to be doing so.
People who use others knowledge as there own
 
Your absolutely right.
But here the problem.
I take data log of the boat on the water. Aka log how long it takes to go from idle to peak RPM.
Load that sweep time into the dyno and it take .83 seconds.
So you are trying to replicate dyno sweeps and get consonant data Ina sweet that is less then 1 second long.


Why does it have to be one second?
 
No dog in this fight. But as you know a pipe is constantly changing temp as the engine runs. Heat effects the speed of the gases and how a pipe performs. The point that is trying to be made is the pipe on a dyno will have more time to gather heat and will not be a correct representation of the curve.

STOP MAKING SENSE! :)

Haven't been over here in months, same old, same old. Few knowledgable folks posting (or trying) good info. Few more dingleberries jacking up these threads. Carry on.

Scottie
 

DAG

Yes, my balls tickled from that landing
Location
Charlotte, NC
Here's what you've all been waiting for. A full comparison Dino chart. You're welcome. View attachment 288701



FINALLY!


image.jpg
 
Top Bottom