Why don't I ever see dyno's?

swapmeet

Brotastic
Location
Arlington TX
Jetski goes through the power and to over rev in the water in less then 1.0 seconds.
You can't simulate that on a load cell dyno. It's too quick. There for it gives you so many variables that you can't reach on the water.

I guess this is the part I can't get my head wrapped around/ can't accept. Does your dyno result have to be a WOT measurement? Or can you gradually add throttle across... 5 or 10 seconds to get your peak results? Honest question.

And maybe i'm wildly off base with this, but simply putting a Two stroke on a dyno would yeild some sort of data would it not? And if you changed something... porting, pipe, timing curve, and stuck it back on the exact same dyno, you would see an improvement or the opposite correct? I mean the percentage of gain may not be accurate on the water, but still you would have an idea that you're headed the right direction.

I guess it gives a base line.

TNT, I feel like you're over here arguing about 10th's of a degree in EGT's and IMO, the "dumb" public just wants some relative idea of:
A. How their engine performs, and
B. How product ____ improves that performance.

I just can't believe that you can't quantify that information on a dyno somehow. Even if its not real world/ in the water etc.




BTW, what do race boat guys do? Because those are 4 strokes does it make it a complete apples and oranges comparison? Don't those guys have the same struggles working on the water? Or do they go though 15 props and 4 exit nozzles and test by timing their runs to find the sweet spot?
 
He has already said the info is next to useless for what you all are asking for? Have any of you ever seen a 1 second dyno run on anything, no transmission means 1 short 1 second run with very little data.
Yet all the experts besides tnt figure they can shoot to the moon with that data!
Give the guy a break, and just go buy his pipe, he deserves that!
 
Location
dfw
Swap what there seems to be a confusion on is the fact that on the dyno the pipes see temps that can never be matched in the water.
Every comparison you guys make is of the same nature.
MB, I have been playing with multi power adders on 4 strokes for a few decades and to be honest got bored.
Look at our quad hillbilly.
YouTube, hillshoot busashee.
And there is a pile of vids on our 4 stroke sleds.
I did thousands of hours on the dyno with them and everything on the dyno came to view in the vehicle. Because the loads where similar in many ways.
Jetski goes through the power and to over rev in the water in less then 1.0 seconds.
You can't simulate that on a load cell dyno. It's two quick. There for it gives you so many variables that you can't reach on the water.
So hypothetically speaking.
Peak two at 5250, peak HP at 6850. Timing at 34 max retards down to 13 above 6k RPM.
Peak hp 115. Peak Tq 90.
EGT1050f.
Pipe ext temp 168 at coupler, 152 deg in dwell 179 deg at rev cone.
Tell me what those numbers will do for you?
I think you drowned your pipe.
 

DAG

Yes, my balls tickled from that landing
Location
Charlotte, NC
MB's in his living room like
64476763.jpg


and Tims like
Preview
 

964Chris

FREEdumb obtained
Location
TEXAS
This is what I get out of reading this thread.

X: Why don't we see dyno figures for my niche sport that no big industry supports and there is barely enough consumers for numbers to support the funding of true R&D through profits on purchased products developed from this sort of expensive and time consuming research?

Guru: I have been in the 2 stroke field since the early 90's and have developed many products for jetskis and snowmobiles where I have also developed 4 stroke products. I have thousands of hours on the dyno and field work. What I have found is dyno/hp numbers are irrelevant without the background knowledge on how to use it, dyno numbers do not translate to actual performance on the water. Big numbers on the dyno do not equal perfomance on the water. If I showed my dyno numbers with hp and torques it would prove WHY my highly sought after products work better than other products that may make better HP numbers and then also show HOW to replicate it which can then be copied by my competitiors and therfore render my research and development useless to me as I will never recoup on it.

X: Well, I have never run a dyno and have not produced any products for the jetski industry but, I have a jetski and I have been READING and posting on a forum for years, I have looked at a lot of pictures, and I have wrenched on my friends skis............I think you are wrong Mr. Guru. Now show me all your research and prove to ME why you are right. I do not trust your experience or highly sought after products.

And I think you need to price your parts well below what it actually costs you to make them, I'd hate to see you make a profit and develop any other products for the jet ski community. Can I get a discount if I send you a PM?
 
Last edited:

tntsuperjet

Tntperformance-engineering.com
Location
Georgetown ca
I guess this is the part I can't get my head wrapped around/ can't accept. Does your dyno result have to be a WOT measurement? Or can you gradually add throttle across... 5 or 10 seconds to get your peak results? Honest question.

And maybe i'm wildly off base with this, but simply putting a Two stroke on a dyno would yeild some sort of data would it not? And if you changed something... porting, pipe, timing curve, and stuck it back on the exact same dyno, you would see an improvement or the opposite correct? I mean the percentage of gain may not be accurate on the water, but still you would have an idea that you're headed the right direction.

I guess it gives a base line.

TNT, I feel like you're over here arguing about 10th's of a degree in EGT's and IMO, the "dumb" public just wants some relative idea of:
A. How their engine performs, and
B. How product ____ improves that performance.

I just can't believe that you can't quantify that information on a dyno somehow. Even if its not real world/ in the water etc.

Picture this. Add water injection multi port to a dry pipe on the dyno. Gain 23hp over your standard dry pipe average power curve, be super stocked thinking you have hit the mother load.
Then take it to the water to find out it's a total pile of crap.
Search for months kill 5-6 sets of Pistons in simple wear trying to make this magic dyno number even remotely show it's face.
Only to remove the water and go faster and hit harder. ???
All because you can't sustain enough load in the water to build the heat inside the pipe to match the load heat the dyno allows the motor to develop.
Keep in mind your talking hundreds of BtU's different in heat generation do to load difference.
You are instantly into over rev on Jetski and you just need enough fuel to make the low torque respond and then your done making power and into over rev.
Bike, car, prop driven boat, plane, sled. All have a veritable engine load. Meaning pitch or gears so the dyno load is very similar to what you run in those vehicles.
Dyno is very useful tuning tool.
Picture this.
Can you take two steps on a 110 deg day on the black top without burning your feet?? Most likely you just say hot hot quickly jump off the hot surface.
Well now stand in one spot 10 seconds tell me if your feet burn!!




BTW, what do race boat guys do? Because those are 4 strokes does it make it a complete apples and oranges comparison? Don't those guys have the same struggles working on the water? Or do they go though 15 props and 4 exit nozzles and test by timing their runs to find the sweet spot?
It's not a tenth of a degree it's hundred of degrees in internal pipe temp.

Picture this. Add water injection multi port to a dry pipe on the dyno. Gain 23hp over your standard dry pipe average power curve, be super stocked thinking you have hit the mother load.
Then take it to the water to find out it's a total pile of crap.
Search for months kill 5-6 sets of Pistons in simple wear trying to make this magic dyno number even remotely show it's face.
Only to remove the water and go faster and hit harder. ???
All because you can't sustain enough load in the water to build the heat inside the pipe to match the load heat the dyno allows the motor to develop.
Keep in mind your talking hundreds of BtU's different in heat generation do to load difference.
You are instantly into over rev on Jetski and you just need enough fuel to make the low torque respond and then your done making power and into over rev.
Bike, car, prop driven boat, plane, sled. All have a veritable engine load. Meaning pitch or gears so the dyno load is very similar to what you run in those vehicles.
Dyno is very useful tuning tool.
Picture this.
Can you take two steps on a 110 deg day on the black top without burning your feet?? Most likely you just say hot hot quickly jump off the hot surface.
Well now stand in one spot 10 seconds tell me if your feet burn!!
 

tntsuperjet

Tntperformance-engineering.com
Location
Georgetown ca
He has already said the info is next to useless for what you all are asking for? Have any of you ever seen a 1 second dyno run on anything, no transmission means 1 short 1 second run with very little data.
Yet all the experts besides tnt figure they can shoot to the moon with that data!
Give the guy a break, and just go buy his pipe, he deserves that!
Thanks for that, but I don't deserve for anyone to buy what we make.
We just hope others can enjoy the gains we made with it in our setups.
So far 60 sold and not one customer hasn't said wow!
Even the few with rocky starts to there tune ended up with big gains.
But so far my favorite comment came from Bruno Jacobs.
POWER NNIIICCCEE
 

tshank123

Yo hablo ingles
Location
Vegas
BTW, what do race boat guys do? Because those are 4 strokes does it make it a complete apples and oranges comparison? Don't those guys have the same struggles working on the water? Or do they go though 15 props and 4 exit nozzles and test by timing their runs to find the sweet spot?

Have you ever visited greenhulk? The answer is, yes they test the crap out of there setups. They dont have 15 props, but they will pull there prop 15 times and bend it then retest.
 

swapmeet

Brotastic
Location
Arlington TX
This is what I get out of reading this thread.

X: Why don't we see dyno figures for my niche sport that no big industry supports and there is barely enough consumers for numbers to support the funding of true R&D through profits on purchased products developed from this sort of expensive and time consuming research?

Guru: I have been in the 2 stroke field since the early 90's and have developed many products for jetskis and snowmobiles where I have also developed 4 stroke products. I have thousands of hours on the dyno and field work. What I have found is dyno/hp numbers are irrelevant without the background knowledge on how to use it, dyno numbers do not translate to actual performance on the water. Big numbers on the dyno do not equal perfomance on the water. If I showed my dyno numbers with hp and torques it would prove WHY my highly sought after products work better than other products that may make better HP numbers and then also show HOW to replicate it which can then be copied by my competitiors and therfore render my research and development useless to me as I will never recoup on it.

X: Well, I have never run a dyno and have not produced any products for the jetski industry but, I have a jetski and I have been READING and posting on a forum for years, I have looked at a lot of pictures, and I have wrenched on my friends skis............I think you are wrong Mr. Guru. Now show me all your research and prove to ME why you are right. I do not trust your experience or highly sought after products.

And I think you need to price your pipes well below what it actually costs you to make them, I'd hate to see you make a profit and develop any other products for the jet ski community. Can I get a discount if I send you a PM?

Exactly what I would expect from someone who works for a engine builder. If engine builders were forced by their customer base to spend more money on R&D, they might have to take that out of your cut. *GASP*


Theres like 2 people asking TNT for his numbers. Maybe just one. But thats not what the thread is about. So lets not pretend that the reason that ALL the engine builders can't share Dyno data because ONE guy making pipes had his design copied one time.


Besides, I thought everyone in this scene was totally cool with people knocking off other peoples stuff?
 

swapmeet

Brotastic
Location
Arlington TX
Have you ever visited greenhulk? The answer is, yes they test the crap out of there setups. They dont have 15 props, but they will pull there prop 15 times and bend it then retest.

I haven't.... It was an honest question. It just seems like those guys have overcome the same issues that we would on dynoing watercraft. I mean thats a pretty niche industry as well, so maybe we could pull from their experience.

So when you say "test/ retest" you mean they're making pulls on the water and checking ET's or Radar for improvements?
 

tshank123

Yo hablo ingles
Location
Vegas
I haven't.... It was an honest question. It just seems like those guys have overcome the same issues that we would on dynoing watercraft. I mean thats a pretty niche industry as well, so maybe we could pull from their experience.

So when you say "test/ retest" you mean they're making pulls on the water and checking ET's or Radar for improvements?

I dont read what the 4 stroke guys do, but the 2 stroke guys will use tach and gps for testing. 10 rpm here or there, .25 mph improvements, shim plate, bend prop, adjust nozzle angle, stuff like that.
 

Big Kahuna

Administrator
Location
Tuscaloosa, AL
I dont read what the 4 stroke guys do, but the 2 stroke guys will use tach and gps for testing. 10 rpm here or there, .25 mph improvements, shim plate, bend prop, adjust nozzle angle, stuff like that.
Bingo. Seat of the Pants Tuning. Find out what really works in real world conditions. That is how I set up my Stock Class SXR. Hours of tuning with a GPS and a PET Tach. Make changes and then see what I get.
 
Exactly what I would expect from someone who works for a engine builder. If engine builders were forced by their customer base to spend more money on R&D, they might have to take that out of your cut. *GASP*


Theres like 2 people asking TNT for his numbers. Maybe just one. But thats not what the thread is about. So lets not pretend that the reason that ALL the engine builders can't share Dyno data because ONE guy making pipes had his design copied one time.


Besides, I thought everyone in this scene was totally cool with people knocking off other peoples stuff?

Precisely the case...The thread was about dynoing engines,The _ _ _ banditos are trying to make it about one complicated multi port water injected pipe that wont match dyno load for heat.. they wont even sell to anything less than a pro tuner..So this one pipe counteracts the whole thread? How bout the one thats single injected on "your" motor..just like the rrp with #s he listed above,think that might be bit more the case..Whats most funny... the worry isnt that someone will buy it then ask for best setup and copy it,rather they will see the Torque chart and just have to copy it...lol.

Dag...that is really funny..replace share with...crush the hype with a fact. Ill prolly have the v2 and at least one of the 2 new pipes coming out at wf, to try out.its not like they are hard to sell used,almost like money in the bank round here.

someone else forwarded me this..
Funny how he has no problem throwing around dyno numbers in his other posts..

Post 1:
http://www.x-h2o.com/index.php?threads/new-tnt-race-motors.155801/

Post 12:
"11hp gains over the TNT super stock chamber and capable of 8400rpm with right setup."
http://www.x-h2o.com/index.php?threads/new-design-tnt-pipe.151882/

Post 16:
http://www.x-h2o.com/index.php?threads/tnt-triple-yamaha-pipe.155469/
 
Location
VA
Good grief, everyone has a big jimmy.

If you want dyno numbers buy the damn pipe and dyno it yourself. Of course with the thousands of variables that are involved it will mean as much as a dyno chart hand drawn by my 4 year old.

I find it funny that the people who are demanding dyno numbers are not trusted and paid tuners...
 
Top Bottom