Tim dont take this the wrong way or the defensive side of it.The v2 sounds like a great pipe.You are doing great things for the sport,not knocking that.This thread is really more about motors and bolt on parts than specifically pipe design.But since you mentioned it,IT would be very nice to see the v2 charted against the pfp since you can pretty much consider a pfp a stock pipe in the freestyle world. You know as well as I no one expects any pipe or engine builder to buy all the setups. Riders come to you willingly for free with all sorts of setups to test against ,you didnt have to buy any of those setups you currently tested on? Why not put up a torque chart of the improvement of this pipe vs their old pipe at the very least. especially since you have access to these setups and a dyno. The real question isnt if its better,its how much better and where in the range is it better? I look forward to seeing your other post come true about seeing #s on those in the spring,hope they are charts and not hollow #s. Pipe market is about to blow up in oct at wf
Fmf has used their dyno for many types comparisons,pipes and motors,so has every other motorsport other than skis,but really up until recently their wasnt much need for it in freestyle market,There were only a couple ski motor manufactures and one pipe,the pfp. Now there are many,for motors and pipes.It makes sense to have have torque charts if you really believe your better than the competition. Here is some work done on fmf dyno of there pipe on all 5 brands bike motors,and another with their pipe vs the top competitors. all facts>hype=more sales
Anyone can read a dyno chart and apply it to their riding type and skill,I dont understand the above posts at all beating the dead horse of its complicated and none of us can get a pump to hook up or be sim to dyno load with out spoon feeding from builder?I assume they didnt read the link,much more than a couple type pipes and values for use of a dyno chart.